From: "Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
To: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
Cc: "Shahaf Shuler" <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
"Adrien Mazarguil" <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
"Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix GRE flow rule
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 22:55:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB5PR05MB167164E6543072F7C5451306AC6B0@DB5PR05MB1671.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523183359.GA13339@yongseok-MBP.local>
Hi Koh,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yongseok Koh
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 2:34 AM
> To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>; Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; Nélio
> Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Xueming(Steven) Li
> <xuemingl@mellanox.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix GRE flow rule
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:45:33AM -0700, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yongseok
> > + Steven
> >
> > From: Yongseok Koh
> > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:36:43PM -0700, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > > > Hi Yongseok
> > > >
> > > > From: Yongseok Koh
> > > > > Creating a flow having pattern from the middle of a packet is
> > > > > allowed. For example,
> > > > >
> > > > > testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern vxlan vni is 20 / end actions ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Device can parse GRE header but without proper support from
> > > > > library and firmware (HAVE_IBV_DEVICE_MPLS_SUPPORT), a field in
> > > > > GRE header can't be specified when creating a rule. As a result,
> > > > > the following rule will be interpreted as a wildcard rule, which
> > > > > always matches any
> > > packet.
> > > > >
> > > > > testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern gre / end actions ...
> > > > > Fixes: 96c6c65a10d2 ("net/mlx5: support GRE tunnel flow")
> > > > > Fixes: 1f106da2bf7b ("net/mlx5: support MPLS-in-GRE and
> > > > > MPLS-in-UDP")
> > > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c | 6 ++++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> > > > > b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c index 994be05be..526fe6b0e 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
> > > > > @@ -330,9 +330,11 @@ static const enum rte_flow_action_type
> > > > > valid_actions[] = { static const struct mlx5_flow_items
> > > > > mlx5_flow_items[] =
> > > {
> > > > > [RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END] = {
> > > > > .items = ITEMS(RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH,
> > > > > +#ifdef HAVE_IBV_DEVICE_MPLS_SUPPORT
> > > >
> > > > The GRE item was here even before the MPLSoGRE support
> > >
> > > Yes, this bug has existed before adding MPLSoGRE support.
> > >
> > > > so I think that this is not the correct fix and even that it can
> > > > hurt the support of GRE for the current customers use it.
> > >
> > > How can it hurt? Please clarify.
> >
> > Someone who uses the next flow and have not the new verbs version of MPLS:
> > flow create 0 ingress pattern gre / ipv4 src is X / end actions ...
> > ipv4 src or any other inner specifications.
> >
> > This flow will probably get any supported tunnel packets with inner ipv4 src = X.
>
> Do you think we should compromise? This is logically wrong for sure. Let me give you a specific
> example.
>
> If I create the following two flows,
>
> flow create 0 ingress pattern vxlan vni is 10 / end actions queue index 3 / mark id 10 / end
> flow create 0 ingress pattern vxlan vni is 20 / end actions queue index 3 / mark id 20 / end
>
> The following two packets will match correctly and have flow ID (10 and 20) according to VNI.
>
> Ether()/IP()/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=10)/Ether()/IPv6()
> Ether()/IP()/UDP()/VXLAN(vni=20)/Ether()/IPv6()
>
> However, if three flows are created as follows,
>
> flow create 0 ingress pattern gre / ipv6 / end actions queue index 3 / mark id 2 / end
> flow create 0 ingress pattern vxlan vni is 10 / end actions queue index 3 / mark id 10 / end
> flow create 0 ingress pattern vxlan vni is 20 / end actions queue index 3 / mark id 20 / end
>
> The packets will hit the first flow regardless of VNI and have wrong flow ID.
> That's why I have to drop this specific GRE case. Whoever is using this kind of GRE flow, that's buggy
> anyway. They have to know it and change it.
Creating rules start with Vxlan or GRE is dangers, outer IP protocol or UDP dst port is not tested.
Such rule mainly exist in lab.
>
> > It may be enough for the current user (which probably use only 1 tunnel type at a certain time).
>
> Router/switch-like applications can have multiple tunnels for sure. I'm not sure who 'the current
> user' is but I don't think we can make such an assumption.
> I don't want to allow users create faulty flows.
I know that GRE has been deployed.
>
> > > > Looks like you must specify at least 1 spec in the GRE to apply it
> > > > correctly as you did for VXLAN, Can you try empty vxlan and fully
> > > > gre (with protocol field)?
> > >
> > > That's exactly the reason why I'm taking this out. If you look at
> > > the code, it doesn't even set any field for GRE if
> > > HAVE_IBV_DEVICE_MPLS_SUPPORT isn't supported. Thus, it is considered
> > > as a wildcard (all-matching) rule. But if it has HAVE_IBV_DEVICE_MPLS_SUPPORT, such pattern can be
> allowed.
> >
> > Yes, so your GRE flow will not work even if you have MPLS support.
>
> I'm not sure what you meant but with IBV MPLS support, I think IBV_FLOW_SPEC_GRE will make things
> right. Without the support, IBV_FLOW_SPEC_VXLAN_TUNNEL is even set for GRE flows.
>
> > I think the issue is generally in all the items:
> > You should not configure them if they miss both at least one
> > self-specification or item which points to them by "next protocol" field.
> >
> > In case of VXLAN tunnels we just don't allow them without
> > self-specification, In case of gre we force the next protocol of the previous item but only when it
> exists.
> > In case of eth(inner),vlan,ipv4,ipv6,udp,tcp we don't force anything.
> >
> > I think we need a global fix for all, this is probably the root cause.
>
> Well, the root-cause is that old device/lib doesn't differentiate GRE from VXLAN when creating flows.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yongseok
>
> > > Having pattern 'vxlan' without vni isn't allowed by mlx5 PMD because
> > > zero VNI is never accepted.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yongseok
> > >
> > > > > + RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GRE, #endif
> > > > > RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN,
> > > > > - RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE,
> > > > > - RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GRE),
> > > > > + RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN_GPE),
> > > > > },
> > > > > [RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH] = {
> > > > > .items = ITEMS(RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-23 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-23 1:51 Yongseok Koh
2018-05-23 5:36 ` Matan Azrad
2018-05-23 10:01 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-05-23 11:45 ` Matan Azrad
2018-05-23 18:34 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-05-23 22:55 ` Xueming(Steven) Li [this message]
2018-05-24 6:34 ` Matan Azrad
2018-05-24 17:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Yongseok Koh
2018-06-19 23:23 ` Yongseok Koh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB5PR05MB167164E6543072F7C5451306AC6B0@DB5PR05MB1671.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=xuemingl@mellanox.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).