From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> To: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org> Cc: "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>, "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>, Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix CPU cycles per pkt stats on transmit modes Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 19:28:52 +0000 Message-ID: <DB6PR0802MB22168BA01CFEE88B4BEF1A67989B0@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1592491803-21173-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <snip> > Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix CPU cycles per pkt stats on transmit modes > > In txonly and flowgen forwarding mode, calculating CPU per packets with total > received packets is not accurate. Use total transmitted packets for these cases. > > The error output under txonly mode: > testpmd> show fwd stats all > > ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 0 ------------------- > RX-packets: 0 RX-dropped: 0 RX-total: 0 > TX-packets: 3582891927 TX-dropped: 401965824 TX-total: 3984857751 > TX-bursts : 86381636 [0% of 0 pkts + 85% of 64 pkts + 15% of 32 pkts] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 1 ------------------- > RX-packets: 1 RX-dropped: 394351696 RX-total: 394351697 > TX-packets: 3582890632 TX-dropped: 401965568 TX-total: 3984856200 > TX-bursts : 86381679 [0% of 0 pkts + 85% of 64 pkts + 15% of 32 pkts] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > +++++++++++++++ Accumulated forward statistics for all > +++++++++++++++ ports+++++++++++++ > RX-packets: 1 RX-dropped: 394351696 RX-total: 394351697 > TX-packets: 7165782559 TX-dropped: 803931392 TX-total: 7969713951 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ++++++++ > > CPU cycles/packet=54984156291.00 \ > (total cycles=54984156291 / total RX packets=1) at 200 MHz Clock > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> > Fixes: 53324971a14e ("app/testpmd: display/clear forwarding stats on > demand") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com > --- > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index > 4989d22..798b8e0 100644 > --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c > +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c > @@ -1961,13 +1961,23 @@ fwd_stats_display(void) > acc_stats_border, acc_stats_border); #ifdef > RTE_TEST_PMD_RECORD_CORE_CYCLES #define CYC_PER_MHZ 1E6 > - if (total_recv > 0) > - printf("\n CPU cycles/packet=%.2F (total cycles=" > - "%"PRIu64" / total RX packets=%"PRIu64") at %"PRIu64 > - " MHz Clock\n", > - (double) fwd_cycles / total_recv, > - fwd_cycles, total_recv, > - (uint64_t)(rte_get_tsc_hz() / CYC_PER_MHZ)); > + if (total_recv > 0 || total_xmit > 0) { > + if (strcmp(cur_fwd_eng->fwd_mode_name, "txonly") == 0 || > + strcmp(cur_fwd_eng->fwd_mode_name, "flowgen") == 0) > + printf("\n CPU cycles/packet=%.2F (total cycles=" > + "%"PRIu64" / total %s packets=%"PRIu64") at %" > + PRIu64" MHz Clock\n", > + (double) fwd_cycles / total_xmit, > + fwd_cycles, cur_fwd_eng->fwd_mode_name, > total_xmit, > + (uint64_t)(rte_get_tsc_hz() / CYC_PER_MHZ)); > + else > + printf("\n CPU cycles/packet=%.2F (total cycles=" > + "%"PRIu64" / total %s packets=%"PRIu64") at %" > + PRIu64" MHz Clock\n", > + (double) fwd_cycles / total_recv, > + fwd_cycles, cur_fwd_eng->fwd_mode_name, > total_recv, > + (uint64_t)(rte_get_tsc_hz() / CYC_PER_MHZ)); > + } nit. Only difference between the two 'printf' calls are total_recv vs total_xmit. Can be consolidated into a single printf. > #endif > } > > -- > 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 19:29 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-18 14:50 Phil Yang 2020-06-18 19:28 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message] 2020-06-19 3:54 ` Phil Yang 2020-06-19 4:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang 2020-06-22 3:39 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli 2020-06-22 8:48 ` Phil Yang 2020-06-22 9:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Phil Yang 2020-07-10 17:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=DB6PR0802MB22168BA01CFEE88B4BEF1A67989B0@DB6PR0802MB2216.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \ --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \ --cc=Phil.Yang@arm.com \ --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \ --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \ --cc=dev@dpdk.org \ --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \ --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \ --cc=nd@arm.com \ --cc=stable@dpdk.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
DPDK patches and discussions This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \ dev@dpdk.org public-inbox-index dev Example config snippet for mirrors. Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git