From: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Mordechay Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>
Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: add support for 32bit systems
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:22:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB7PR05MB442601274A25249B4B5512E6C35A0@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531d3d96-9b76-b59b-9c88-fdb3b723373a@intel.com>
Hi Ferruh,
Thursday, July 5, 2018 2:27 PM, Ferruh Yigit:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: add support for 32bit systems
>
> On 7/5/2018 11:09 AM, Mordechay Haimovsky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Didn’t see it in our setups (not an excuse), Investigating ....
>
> Thanks. Perhaps it can be related to compiler version:
> gcc (GCC) 8.1.1 20180502 (Red Hat 8.1.1-1) (ICC 32bit also gave same build
> error.)
>
> btw, to clarify rdma-core v19 build errors was not just for 32bit build, I lost my
> log but I can reproduce if you require.
Thanks for reporting it we will fix.
Here is the plan to include the patchset upstream:
1. there is a fix on rmda-core v19+ for the 32b compilation issue seen
2. as you reported there is another compilation issue w/ v19 which needs to be solved (I will provide a fix patch).
3. #2 fix patch should be on top of series : https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=512
So the plan is to integrate the series and after it the compilation fix patch and the 32b support one.
Do you agree?
I hope the above series will be merge at the beginning of next week.
>
> >
> > Moti
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 4:49 PM
> >> To: Mordechay Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> >> <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> >> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: add support for 32bit
> >> systems
> >>
> >> On 7/2/2018 12:11 PM, Moti Haimovsky wrote:
> >>> This patch adds support for building and running mlx5 PMD on 32bit
> >>> systems such as i686.
> >>>
> >>> The main issue to tackle was handling the 32bit access to the UAR as
> >>> quoted from the mlx5 PRM:
> >>> QP and CQ DoorBells require 64-bit writes. For best performance, it
> >>> is recommended to execute the QP/CQ DoorBell as a single 64-bit
> >>> write operation. For platforms that do not support 64 bit writes, it
> >>> is possible to issue the 64 bits DoorBells through two consecutive
> >>> writes, each write 32 bits, as described below:
> >>> * The order of writing each of the Dwords is from lower to upper
> >>> addresses.
> >>> * No other DoorBell can be rung (or even start ringing) in the midst of
> >>> an on-going write of a DoorBell over a given UAR page.
> >>> The last rule implies that in a multi-threaded environment, the
> >>> access to a UAR page (which can be accessible by all threads in the
> >>> process) must be synchronized (for example, using a semaphore)
> >>> unless an atomic write of 64 bits in a single bus operation is
> >>> guaranteed. Such a synchronization is not required for when ringing
> >>> DoorBells on different UAR pages.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Moti Haimovsky <motih@mellanox.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2:
> >>> * Fixed coding style issues.
> >>> * Modified documentation according to review inputs.
> >>> * Fixed merge conflicts.
> >>> ---
> >>> doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini | 1 +
> >>> doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 6 +++-
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c | 8 ++++-
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h | 5 +++
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_defs.h | 18 ++++++++--
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c | 6 +++-
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 22 +++++++------
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h | 69
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c | 13 +++++++-
> >>> 9 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> >>> b/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> >>> index e75b14b..b28b43e 100644
> >>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> >>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/mlx5.ini
> >>> @@ -43,5 +43,6 @@ Multiprocess aware = Y
> >>> Other kdrv = Y
> >>> ARMv8 = Y
> >>> Power8 = Y
> >>> +x86-32 = Y
> >>> x86-64 = Y
> >>> Usage doc = Y
> >>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> >>> index
> >>> 7dd9c1c..5fbad60 100644
> >>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> >>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
> >>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ libibverbs.
> >>> Features
> >>> --------
> >>>
> >>> -- Multi arch support: x86_64, POWER8, ARMv8.
> >>> +- Multi arch support: x86_64, POWER8, ARMv8, i686.
> >>> - Multiple TX and RX queues.
> >>> - Support for scattered TX and RX frames.
> >>> - IPv4, IPv6, TCPv4, TCPv6, UDPv4 and UDPv6 RSS on any number of
> >> queues.
> >>> @@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ RMDA Core with Linux Kernel
> >>> - Minimal kernel version : v4.14 or the most recent 4.14-rc (see
> >>> `Linux installation documentation`_)
> >>> - Minimal rdma-core version: v15+ commit 0c5f5765213a ("Merge pull
> >> request #227 from yishaih/tm")
> >>> (see `RDMA Core installation documentation`_)
> >>> +- When building for i686 use:
> >>> +
> >>> + - rdma-core version 18.0 or above built with 32bit support.
> >>
> >> related "or above" part, v19 giving build errors with mlx5, FYI.
> >>
> >> And with v18 getting build errors originated from rdma headers [1],
> >> am I doing something wrong?
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> In file included from .../dpdk/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_glue.c:20:
> >> .../rdma-core/build32/include/infiniband/mlx5dv.h: In function
> >> ‘mlx5dv_x86_set_data_seg’:
> >> .../rdma-core/build32/include/infiniband/mlx5dv.h:787:69: error:
> >> right shift count >= width of type [-Werror=shift-count-overflow]
> >> __m128i val = _mm_set_epi32((uint32_t)address, (uint32_t)(address
> >> >> 32), lkey, length);
> >> ^~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-11 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 7:12 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Moti Haimovsky
2018-07-02 7:05 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-02 10:39 ` Mordechay Haimovsky
2018-07-02 11:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Moti Haimovsky
2018-07-02 20:59 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-07-03 12:03 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-04 13:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-05 10:09 ` Mordechay Haimovsky
2018-07-05 11:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-11 12:22 ` Shahaf Shuler [this message]
2018-07-05 17:07 ` Mordechay Haimovsky
2018-07-05 17:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-07-09 7:23 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-08 17:04 ` Mordechay Haimovsky
2018-07-12 12:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Moti Haimovsky
2018-07-13 6:16 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-07-18 8:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB7PR05MB442601274A25249B4B5512E6C35A0@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=motih@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).