DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
	"mb@smartsharesystems.com" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	Kamalakshitha Aligeri <Kamalakshitha.Aligeri@arm.com>,
	Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] mempool: use lcore API to check if lcore ID is valid
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 04:01:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB58141A79477BC4B98B8C1F8998BA9@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871c50be83964a08b7c2122d1694c80d@huawei.com>

<snip>
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Use lcore API to check if the lcore ID is valid. The runtime check
> > does not add much value.
> 
> From my perspective it adds a perfect value:
> Only threads with valid lcore id have their own default mempool cache.
The threads would call 'rte_lcore_id()' to return their lcore_id. This ensures the lcore_id is valid already. Why do we need to check it again in rte_mempool_default_cache? Why would a thread use an incorrect lcore_id?

> 
> > Hence use assert to validate
> > the lcore ID.
> 
> Wonder why?
> What's wrong for the thread to try to get default mempool cache?
What are the cases where a thread does not know that it is not an EAL thread and call rte_mempool_default_cache with a random lcore_id?
Since, this API is called in the data plane, it makes sense to remove any additional validations.

> That would change existing behavior and in general seems wrong to me.
Agree on the change in existing behavior. We can discuss this once we agree/disagree on the above.

> So I am strongly opposed.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > index 009bd10215..00c5aa961b 100644
> > --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> > @@ -1314,10 +1314,9 @@ rte_mempool_cache_free(struct
> rte_mempool_cache
> > *cache);  static __rte_always_inline struct rte_mempool_cache *
> > rte_mempool_default_cache(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned lcore_id)
> > {
> > -	if (mp->cache_size == 0)
> > -		return NULL;
> > +	RTE_ASSERT(rte_lcore_id_is_valid(lcore_id));
> >
> > -	if (lcore_id >= RTE_MAX_LCORE)
> > +	if (mp->cache_size == 0)
> >  		return NULL;
> >
> >  	rte_mempool_trace_default_cache(mp, lcore_id,
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-10  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09  4:57 [PATCH 0/4] Small corrections in mempool Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-09  4:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] mempool: clarify mempool cache flush API behavior Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-06-07 10:03   ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-09  4:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] mempool: clarify comments for mempool cache implementation Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-06-07 10:10   ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-04 21:08     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-09  4:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] eal: add API to check if lcore id is valid Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-06-07 10:19   ` Morten Brørup
2023-06-07 15:05     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-09  4:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] mempool: use lcore API to check if lcore ID " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-03-09  9:39   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-03-10  4:01     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2023-03-10 14:06       ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-07  9:35 ` [PATCH 0/4] Small corrections in mempool Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB58141A79477BC4B98B8C1F8998BA9@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Kamalakshitha.Aligeri@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).