From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
venkatesh bs <venki.bsv@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: clarification on RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF flag
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:52:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB58144E8286D8FBA53BBC525A98829@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220706082256.562c1b69@hermes.local>
<snip>
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 19:07:54 +0530
> venkatesh bs <venki.bsv@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In multithreaded/Multicore environment can we use
> > RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF
> > independently,
This flag is about reader-writer concurrency (not writer-writer concurrency). Reader-writer concurrency will use lock-free algorithm allowing for the data plane to scale well.
> > or this flag should always be used with
> > RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD.
If you have multiple writers, you need to enable this flag. This is unrelated to RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF.
> >
> > We are trying to create and access the hash table with
> > RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF
> > only.
> > We are getting crashes in multi core environments , we debugged
> > nothing wrong in the application , everything looks good.
If the crash is happening while adding/deleting keys and there are multiple writers, enabling RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD might solve the problem.
> >
> > We call rte_hash_del_key() first and from the returned position we are
> > calling rte_hash_free_key_with_position().
> >
> > Please let me know if we missed something.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Venkatesh.
>
> Repeating same question doesn't get answer faster.
>
> Read the code, it is fairly straightforward.
>
> The multi-writer add means that writers take a lock.
> If doing lock free support then:
> 1. It is up to your application to use a single writer and/or
> wrap writer calls in a lock.
>
> 2. You need to use RCU mechanism to guarantee that no reader
> will access a deleted entry. Something like:
>
> rte_hash_del_key()
> synchronize_rcu()
> rte_hash_free_key_with_position()
>
> You can use either the DPDK RCU library or the userspace RCU library.
> Read that documentation, RCU is non-trivial change.
RCU is integrated in the hash library. You could use that as well. Look at ' rte_hash_rcu_qsbr_add' API for more details.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-08 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-06 3:45 venkatesh bs
2022-07-06 13:37 ` venkatesh bs
2022-07-06 14:21 ` venkatesh bs
2022-07-06 15:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-07-08 17:52 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB58144E8286D8FBA53BBC525A98829@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=venki.bsv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).