DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/ring: add check to validate the dequeued objects
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 20:50:58 +0000
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB5814578375E8FE24D0679E2898540@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200805061421.13037-5-feifei.wang2@arm.com>

Hi Feifei,
	Can you add this at the head of the series? It will help with proving that the test case fails and hence we need subsequent fixes.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2020 1:14 AM
> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Konstantin
> Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>; Feifei Wang <Feifei.Wang2@arm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] test/ring: add check to validate the dequeued objects
> 
> For the single element enqueue and dequeue in test_ring_basic_ex and
> test_ring_with_exact_size, add check to validate the dequeued objects.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_ring.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ring.c b/app/test/test_ring.c index
> 51bae0d48..a1ff73a05 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ring.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ring.c
> @@ -791,15 +791,9 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
>  	int ret = -1;
>  	unsigned int i, j;
>  	struct rte_ring *rp = NULL;
> -	void *obj = NULL;
> +	void **src = NULL, **cur_src = NULL, **dst = NULL, **cur_dst = NULL;
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(esize); i++) {
> -		obj = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> -		if (obj == NULL) {
> -			printf("%s: failed to alloc memory\n", __func__);
> -			goto fail_test;
> -		}
> -
>  		rp = test_ring_create("test_ring_basic_ex", esize[i], RING_SIZE,
>  					SOCKET_ID_ANY,
>  					RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
> @@ -808,6 +802,23 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
>  			goto fail_test;
>  		}
> 
> +		/* alloc dummy object pointers */
> +		src = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> +		if (src == NULL) {
> +			printf("%s: failed to alloc src memory\n", __func__);
> +			goto fail_test;
> +		}
> +		test_ring_mem_init(src, RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> +		cur_src = src;
> +
> +		/* alloc some room for copied objects */
> +		dst = test_ring_calloc(RING_SIZE, esize[i]);
> +		if (dst == NULL) {
> +			printf("%s: failed to alloc dst memory\n", __func__);
> +			goto fail_test;
> +		}
> +		cur_dst = dst;
> +
>  		if (rte_ring_lookup("test_ring_basic_ex") != rp) {
>  			printf("%s: failed to find ring\n", __func__);
>  			goto fail_test;
> @@ -823,8 +834,9 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
>  			rte_ring_free_count(rp));
> 
>  		for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE - 1; j++) {
> -			test_ring_enqueue(rp, obj, esize[i], 1,
> +			test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> +			cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
>  		}
> 
>  		if (rte_ring_full(rp) != 1) {
> @@ -834,8 +846,9 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
>  		}
> 
>  		for (j = 0; j < RING_SIZE - 1; j++) {
> -			test_ring_dequeue(rp, obj, esize[i], 1,
> +			test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 1,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> +			cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 1);
>  		}
> 
>  		if (rte_ring_empty(rp) != 1) {
> @@ -844,52 +857,88 @@ test_ring_basic_ex(void)
>  			goto fail_test;
>  		}
> 
> +		/* check data */
> +		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src))) {
> +			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src,
> +					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
> +			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst,
> +					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
> +			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
> +			goto fail_test;
> +		}
> +
> +
>  		/* Following tests use the configured flags to decide
>  		 * SP/SC or MP/MC.
>  		 */
> +		/* reset dst */
> +		if (esize[i] == -1)
> +			memset(dst, 0, RING_SIZE * sizeof(void *));
> +		else
> +			memset(dst, 0, RING_SIZE * esize[i]);
Can you convert the above into a function like 'test_ring_mem_reset'?

> +
> +		/* reset cur_src and cur_dst */
> +		cur_src = src;
> +		cur_dst = dst;
> +
>  		/* Covering the ring burst operation */
> -		ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> +		ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 2,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
>  		if (ret != 2) {
>  			printf("%s: rte_ring_enqueue_burst fails\n", __func__);
>  			goto fail_test;
>  		}
> +		cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
> 
> -		ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> +		ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 2,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
>  		if (ret != 2) {
>  			printf("%s: rte_ring_dequeue_burst fails\n", __func__);
>  			goto fail_test;
>  		}
> +		cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
> 
>  		/* Covering the ring bulk operation */
> -		ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> +		ret = test_ring_enqueue(rp, cur_src, esize[i], 2,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BULK);
>  		if (ret != 2) {
>  			printf("%s: rte_ring_enqueue_bulk fails\n", __func__);
>  			goto fail_test;
>  		}
> +		cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 2);
> 
> -		ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, obj, esize[i], 2,
> +		ret = test_ring_dequeue(rp, cur_dst, esize[i], 2,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BULK);
>  		if (ret != 2) {
>  			printf("%s: rte_ring_dequeue_bulk fails\n", __func__);
>  			goto fail_test;
>  		}
> +		cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], 2);
> +
> +		/* check data */
> +		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
> +			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src,
> +					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
> +			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst,
> +					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
> +			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
> +			goto fail_test;
> +		}
> 
>  		rte_ring_free(rp);
> -		rte_free(obj);
> +		rte_free(src);
> +		rte_free(dst);
>  		rp = NULL;
> -		obj = NULL;
> +		src = NULL;
> +		dst = NULL;
>  	}
> 
>  	return 0;
> 
>  fail_test:
>  	rte_ring_free(rp);
> -	if (obj != NULL)
> -		rte_free(obj);
> -
> +	rte_free(src);
> +	rte_free(dst);
>  	return -1;
>  }
> 
> @@ -900,8 +949,8 @@ static int
>  test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
>  {
>  	struct rte_ring *std_r = NULL, *exact_sz_r = NULL;
> -	void *obj_orig;
> -	void *obj;
> +	void **src_orig = NULL, **dst_orig = NULL;
> +	void **src = NULL, **cur_src = NULL, **dst = NULL, **cur_dst = NULL;
>  	const unsigned int ring_sz = 16;
>  	unsigned int i, j;
>  	int ret = -1;
> @@ -911,14 +960,6 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
>  				TEST_RING_IGNORE_API_TYPE,
>  				esize[i]);
> 
> -		/* alloc object pointers. Allocate one extra object
> -		 * and create an unaligned address.
> -		 */
> -		obj_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> -		if (obj_orig == NULL)
> -			goto test_fail;
> -		obj = ((char *)obj_orig) + 1;
> -
>  		std_r = test_ring_create("std", esize[i], ring_sz,
>  					rte_socket_id(),
>  					RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
> @@ -936,6 +977,22 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
>  			goto test_fail;
>  		}
> 
> +		/* alloc object pointers. Allocate one extra object
> +		 * and create an unaligned address.
> +		 */
> +		src_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> +		if (src_orig == NULL)
> +			goto test_fail;
> +		test_ring_mem_init(src_orig, 17, esize[i]);
> +		src = ((void **)src_orig) + 1;
                                         ^^^^^^ This does not create an unaligned address. You have to use the typecasting to 'char *' like in the original code.

> +		cur_src = src;
> +
> +		dst_orig = test_ring_calloc(17, esize[i]);
> +		if (dst_orig == NULL)
> +			goto test_fail;
> +		dst = ((void **)dst_orig) + 1;
Same here.

> +		cur_dst = dst;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * Check that the exact size ring is bigger than the
>  		 * standard ring
> @@ -952,33 +1009,36 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
>  		 * than the standard ring. (16 vs 15 elements)
>  		 */
>  		for (j = 0; j < ring_sz - 1; j++) {
> -			test_ring_enqueue(std_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> +			test_ring_enqueue(std_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> -			test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> +			test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
> +			cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
>  		}
> -		ret = test_ring_enqueue(std_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> +		ret = test_ring_enqueue(std_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
>  		if (ret != -ENOBUFS) {
>  			printf("%s: error, unexpected successful enqueue\n",
>  				__func__);
>  			goto test_fail;
>  		}
> -		ret = test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, obj, esize[i], 1,
> +		ret = test_ring_enqueue(exact_sz_r, cur_src, esize[i], 1,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_SINGLE);
>  		if (ret == -ENOBUFS) {
>  			printf("%s: error, enqueue failed\n", __func__);
>  			goto test_fail;
>  		}
> +		cur_src = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_src, esize[i], 1);
> 
>  		/* check that dequeue returns the expected number of
> elements */
> -		ret = test_ring_dequeue(exact_sz_r, obj, esize[i], ring_sz,
> +		ret = test_ring_dequeue(exact_sz_r, cur_dst, esize[i], ring_sz,
>  				TEST_RING_THREAD_DEF |
> TEST_RING_ELEM_BURST);
>  		if (ret != (int)ring_sz) {
>  			printf("%s: error, failed to dequeue expected nb of
> elements\n",
>  				__func__);
>  			goto test_fail;
>  		}
> +		cur_dst = test_ring_inc_ptr(cur_dst, esize[i], ring_sz);
> 
>  		/* check that the capacity function returns expected value */
>  		if (rte_ring_get_capacity(exact_sz_r) != ring_sz) { @@ -987,10
> +1047,22 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
>  			goto test_fail;
>  		}
> 
> -		rte_free(obj_orig);
> +		/* check data */
> +		if (memcmp(src, dst, RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst))) {
> +			rte_hexdump(stdout, "src", src,
> +					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_src, src));
> +			rte_hexdump(stdout, "dst", dst,
> +					RTE_PTR_DIFF(cur_dst, dst));
> +			printf("data after dequeue is not the same\n");
> +			goto test_fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		rte_free(src_orig);
> +		rte_free(dst_orig);
>  		rte_ring_free(std_r);
>  		rte_ring_free(exact_sz_r);
> -		obj_orig = NULL;
> +		src_orig = NULL;
> +		dst_orig = NULL;
>  		std_r = NULL;
>  		exact_sz_r = NULL;
>  	}
> @@ -998,7 +1070,8 @@ test_ring_with_exact_size(void)
>  	return 0;
> 
>  test_fail:
> -	rte_free(obj_orig);
> +	rte_free(src_orig);
> +	rte_free(dst_orig);
>  	rte_ring_free(std_r);
>  	rte_ring_free(exact_sz_r);
>  	return -1;
> --
> 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-29  6:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] wrong pointer passed of ring Feifei Wang
2020-07-29  6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] ring: fix the misdescription of the param Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 15:59   ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 16:24     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-07-29 19:34       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:16     ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31  5:26       ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-29  6:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] test/ring: fix wrong param passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 13:48   ` David Marchand
2020-07-29 14:16     ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 14:21       ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2020-07-29 15:03         ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-29 21:24           ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-30 10:28             ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-07-31  6:25               ` Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] wrong pointer passed and add check Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27  9:05       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] test/ring: fix the wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:51     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-08-27  8:54       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-08-05  6:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] test/ring: add check to validate the dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-08-26 20:50     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-08-27  8:47       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-11 16:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:26     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:28     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:29     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-11 16:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14  4:37     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-14  9:20       ` David Marchand
2020-09-11 16:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] test/ring: fix wrong number " Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-14 14:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] fix wrong passed pointer and add check Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-15  6:27   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-17 16:26     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-20 11:54       ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/7] test/ring: fix wrong parameter passed to the enqueue APIs Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/7] test/ring: fix wrong number of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/7] test/ring: fix wrong size used in memcmp Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/7] test/ring: add check to validate dequeued objects Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/7] test/ring: validate the return value of enq/deq elements Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/7] test/ring: add new function to validate dequeue data Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 11:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/7] test/ring: improve the application of macro Feifei Wang
2020-09-20 15:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-23  9:24   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB5814578375E8FE24D0679E2898540@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Feifei.Wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git