DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: "Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
	"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] event/sw: performance improvements
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:38:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB5814907968595EE56F5E20A798390@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46118f3466274596a663d7d44abb680a@intel.com>

<snip>



Add minimum burst throughout the scheduler pipeline and a flush counter.

Replace ring API calls with local single threaded implementation where

possible.



Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com><mailto:radu.nicolau@intel.com>



Thanks for the patch, a few comments inline.



---

 drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.h           | 11 +++-

 drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c | 83

+++++++++++++++++++++++----

 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)



diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.h b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.h

index 7c77b2495..95e51065f 100644

--- a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.h

+++ b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev.h

@@ -29,7 +29,13 @@

 /* report dequeue burst sizes in buckets */  #define

SW_DEQ_STAT_BUCKET_SHIFT 2

 /* how many packets pulled from port by sched */ -#define

SCHED_DEQUEUE_BURST_SIZE 32

+#define SCHED_DEQUEUE_BURST_SIZE 64

+

+#define SCHED_MIN_BURST_SIZE 8

+#define SCHED_NO_ENQ_CYCLE_FLUSH 256

+/* set SCHED_DEQUEUE_BURST_SIZE to 64 or 128 when setting this to 1*/

+#define SCHED_REFILL_ONCE_PER_CALL 1



Is it possible to make the above #define a runtime option?

Eg, --vdev event_sw,refill_iter=1



That would allow packaged versions of DPDK to be usable in both modes.



+



 #define SW_PORT_HIST_LIST (MAX_SW_PROD_Q_DEPTH) /* size of our

history list */  #define NUM_SAMPLES 64 /* how many data points use

for average stats */ @@ -214,6 +220,9 @@ struct sw_evdev {

     uint32_t xstats_count_mode_port;

     uint32_t xstats_count_mode_queue;



+    uint16_t sched_flush_count;

+    uint16_t sched_min_burst;

+

     /* Contains all ports - load balanced and directed */

     struct sw_port ports[SW_PORTS_MAX] __rte_cache_aligned;



diff --git a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c

b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c

index cff747da8..ca6d1caff 100644

--- a/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c

+++ b/drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_scheduler.c

@@ -26,6 +26,29 @@

 /* use cheap bit mixing, we only need to lose a few bits */  #define

SW_HASH_FLOWID(f) (((f) ^ (f >> 10)) & FLOWID_MASK)



+

+/* single object enq and deq for non MT ring */ static

+__rte_always_inline void sw_nonmt_ring_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r,

+void **obj) {

+    if ((r->prod.tail - r->cons.tail) < 1)

+            return;

+    void **ring = (void **)&r[1];

+    *obj = ring[r->cons.tail & r->mask];

+    r->cons.tail++;

+}

+static __rte_always_inline int

+sw_nonmt_ring_enqueue(struct rte_ring *r, void *obj) {

+    if ((r->capacity + r->cons.tail - r->prod.tail) < 1)

+            return 0;

+    void **ring = (void **)&r[1];

+    ring[r->prod.tail & r->mask] = obj;

+    r->prod.tail++;

+    return 1;

+

Why not make these APIs part of the rte_ring library? You could further optimize them by keeping the indices on the same cacheline.

I'm not sure there is any need for non thread-safe rings outside this particular case.

[Honnappa] I think if we add the APIs, we will find the use cases.

But, more than that, I understand that rte_ring structure is exposed to the application. The reason for doing that is the inline functions that rte_ring provides. IMO, we should still maintain modularity and should not use the internals of the rte_ring structure outside of the library.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-24 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-08 10:52 Radu Nicolau
2020-09-23 11:13 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-09-23 23:10   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-24 15:27     ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-09-24 17:38       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2020-09-24 18:02         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-09-25 10:28           ` Bruce Richardson
2020-09-28 16:02             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-29  9:02               ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-10-05 16:35                 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-06  7:59                   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-10-06 10:13                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-07 10:44                       ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-10-07 10:52                         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-13 19:11                           ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-14  8:32                             ` Nicolau, Radu
2020-10-14 10:09                               ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-14 10:21                                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-14 18:27                                   ` Jerin Jacob
2020-09-28  8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Radu Nicolau
2020-09-28 13:47   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-10-07 13:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Radu Nicolau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB5814907968595EE56F5E20A798390@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).