DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Kathleen Capella <Kathleen.Capella@arm.com>,
	 Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/1] app/testpmd: add l3fwd mode to testpmd
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:46:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB58149958EA94CB521EB1CC8598C59@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1da457e8-4cf7-289d-01da-d68b8b0e6cf4@intel.com>

<snip>

> 
> On 7/2/2021 11:15 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > @Xiaoyun could you share your thoughts on it?
> >
> > As far as I remember there is no agreement on the topic. Adding more
> > people in Cc.
> >
> 
> I was OK for adding simple l3fwd forwarding engine to testpmd, to benefit from
> configuration/debugging/measurement benefits testpmd brings as patch
> mentions.
> 
> But adding neon will likely bring other architecture specific implementations,
> and there will be more code duplicates, which is not good.
> Also it is possible that people may want to add more lookup methods (em, fib..)
> making things worse.
The main goal we are trying to address is the ability to debugging the performance issues of the L3fwd application. As far as I know, the marketing folks care about LPM (may be replace LPM with fib). We could definitely avoid adding exact match.
Since the L3fwd application is about showcasing the best possible performance, it is better to keep vector implementation and skip scalar code. This will help debug the correct code path.

> 
> If we get the feature, what about limiting it to scalar implementation and LPM?
I agree with LPM, scalar only might not be very useful.

> Still it is questionable to have the feature in the testpmd, but at least we limit
> the scope.
> For performance measurements can use the l3fwd sample application.
> 
> Another point is testing, this feature should come with dts updates to test
> testpmd l3fwd, otherwise it may not be tested and turn into dead code easily.
Agree

> 
> 
> > On 5/1/21 12:37 AM, Kathleen Capella wrote:
> >> Performance of the LPM mode in L3fwd example application is used as
> >> an industry standard to compare between various platforms.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, L3fwd example application lacks debugging capabilities
> >> to understand the performance bottlenecks and fix them.
> >>
> >> While debugging performance issues we need all the flexibility possible.
> >> Some of the capabilities we have used are:
> >> 1) ability to print hardware and software statistics - xstats, stats at
> >>    port/queue level, burst stats to identify any headroom available,
> >>    CPU cycles/packet etc
> >> 2) ability to modify all possible configurable parameters for the PMD
> >>    as well as the application at run time without recompiling the code.
> >>    Some of the parameters we have used are RX/TX queue depths, burst size,
> >>    number of receive queues, PMD specific parameters etc. This
> >>    configurability at runtime helps to understand and debug L3fwd
> >>    performance issues quickly and effectively.
> >>
> >> It is possible to add all these capabilities to L3fwd example application.
> >> However, doing that we will result in L3fwd example application
> >> losing its purpose (of being a sample application). At the same time,
> >> testpmd application has all these capabilities to debug an
> >> application. In my opinion it makes sense to add L3fwd mode to testpmd.
> >>
> >> This patch adds l3fwd mode into testpmd to take advantage of the
> >> existing infrastructure in testpmd.
> >>
> >> I'd like to hear from the community if the structure of this change
> >> makes sense, namely, adding l3fwd as a separate fwd_engine into testpmd.
> >>
> >> This feature is not yet implemeted for SSE or AltiVec.
> >>
> >> Kathleen Capella (1):
> >>   app/testpmd: add l3fwd mode to testpmd
> >>
> >>  app/test-pmd/config.c         |  66 +++++++
> >>  app/test-pmd/l3fwd.c          | 356 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  app/test-pmd/l3fwd.h          | 143 ++++++++++++++
> >>  app/test-pmd/l3fwd_common.h   | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  app/test-pmd/l3fwd_lpm.h      | 107 ++++++++++
> >>  app/test-pmd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h | 169 ++++++++++++++++
> >>  app/test-pmd/l3fwd_neon.h     | 234 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  app/test-pmd/meson.build      |   3 +-
> >>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c        |   4 +-
> >>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.h        |  20 ++
> >>  10 files changed, 1368 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)  create mode
> >> 100644 app/test-pmd/l3fwd.c  create mode 100644 app/test-pmd/l3fwd.h
> >> create mode 100644 app/test-pmd/l3fwd_common.h  create mode 100644
> >> app/test-pmd/l3fwd_lpm.h  create mode 100644
> >> app/test-pmd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h  create mode 100644
> >> app/test-pmd/l3fwd_neon.h
> >>
> >


      reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-30 21:37 Kathleen Capella
2021-04-30 21:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/1] " Kathleen Capella
2021-07-02 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/1] " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-24 13:00   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-24 14:46     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB58149958EA94CB521EB1CC8598C59@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=Kathleen.Capella@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).