DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Use WFE for spinlock and ring
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:58:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBAPR08MB58149B2DBEC6CE840807277998199@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0802MB246580297FA7EA13D115499A9E199@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

<snip>

> >
> > On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 05:56:51 +0000
> > Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The rte_wait_until_equal_xxx APIs abstract the functionality of
> > > 'polling for a memory location to become equal to a given value'[1].
> > >
> > > Use the API for the rte spinlock and ring implementations.
> > > With the wait until equal APIs being stable, changes will not impact ABI.
> > >
> > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/62703/
> > >
> > > v3:
> > > Series rebased. (David)
> > >
> > > Gavin Hu (1):
> > >   spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64
> > >
> > > Ruifeng Wang (1):
> > >   ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update on aarch64
> > >
> > >  lib/eal/include/generic/rte_spinlock.h | 4 ++--
> > >  lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h            | 4 ++--
> > >  lib/ring/rte_ring_generic_pvt.h        | 3 +--
> > >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Other places that should use WFE:
> Thank you Stephen for looking into this.
> 
> >
> > rte_mcslock.h:rte_mcslock_lock()
> Existing API can be used in this one.
> 
> > rte_mcslock_unlock:rte_mcslock_unlock()
> This one needs rte_wait_while_xxx variant.
> 
> >
> > rte_pflock.h:rte_pflock_lock()
> > rte_rwlock.h:rte_rwlock_read_lock()
> > rte_rwlock.h:rte_rwlock_write_lock()
> These occurrences have extra logic (AND, conditional branch, CAS) in the loop.
> I'm not sure generic API can be abstracted from these use cases.
I think it is possible to create additional abstractions to address these cases.

> 
> >
> >
> > You should also introduce rte_wait_while_XXX variants to handle some
> > of these cases.
> >
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-08 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24  7:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] " Gavin Hu
2020-04-24  7:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Gavin Hu
2020-04-24  7:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Gavin Hu
2020-04-24 13:23   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-26  8:41     ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-24 14:46   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-26  8:33     ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-26  8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Gavin Hu
2020-05-01  9:47   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-03 14:54   ` David Marchand
2020-05-03 21:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-25 14:30       ` David Marchand
2021-03-25 14:58         ` David Marchand
2021-04-25  6:06           ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-25 15:56             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-26  8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Gavin Hu
2020-04-28 12:22   ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-26  8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Gavin Hu
2021-04-25  5:56 ` [dpdk-dev] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-25  5:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-25  5:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-26  5:38     ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-28 17:17     ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-29 14:35       ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-29 15:05         ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-05-07  8:25           ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-28  7:42   ` [dpdk-dev] Use WFE for spinlock and ring David Marchand
2021-04-28  9:30     ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-28 11:13       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-29 14:28         ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-29 15:20           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-30  9:16             ` Bruce Richardson
2021-04-30 13:41               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-04-30 14:19                 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-05-07 10:18                   ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-05-07 10:24                     ` Bruce Richardson
2021-07-05  8:51                       ` David Marchand
2021-07-05 10:21                         ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 14:47   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-08  9:41     ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-08 16:58       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2021-07-07  5:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] " Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  5:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  5:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  5:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] build: add option to enable wait until equal Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 12:15     ` David Marchand
2021-07-07  5:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  5:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  5:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  5:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] build: add option to enable wait until equal Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  6:32     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-07  6:46       ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 12:27         ` Bruce Richardson
2021-07-07 12:36           ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-08  6:25             ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-08  6:32               ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-08  7:32                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-08  9:21                   ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-08 10:28                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-09 18:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBAPR08MB58149B2DBEC6CE840807277998199@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).