From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3145E2E8A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:01:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2014 06:57:04 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,724,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="548423950"
Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Jul 2014 07:02:25 -0700
Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.99) by
 IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:02:24 +0100
Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.65]) by
 IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.138]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003;
 Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:02:24 +0100
From: "Kavanagh, Mark B" <mark.b.kavanagh@intel.com>
To: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static
 libraries
Thread-Index: Ac+mjVcpsN1nIv2YR/u0C0/y6Ulg5v///VMA//+bJLCAAL3vAP/+4V7g
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:02:23 +0000
Message-ID: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BBA84E@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3C50@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <53CFE4C6.7080506@fixup.fi>
 <DC5AD7FA266D86499789B1BCAEC715F846BA3CFA@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20140723215614.GA19555@mhcomputing.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140723215614.GA19555@mhcomputing.net>
Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static
 libraries
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:01:19 -0000

Many thanks to all for your help.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mhall@mhcomputing.net] =

Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 10:56 PM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B
Cc: Antti Kantee; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static=
 libraries

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:43:49PM +0000, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> I take it ... that the performance drop when using shared libraries is =

> expected behavior?

s/expected behavior/and unavoidable consequence/g

;)

Matthew Hall.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the s=
ole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others =
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please conta=
ct the sender and delete all copies.