From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8821396 for ; Thu, 7 May 2015 03:57:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2015 18:57:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,382,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="725024136" Received: from pgsmsx103.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.82]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 May 2015 18:57:30 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 7 May 2015 09:57:20 +0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.107]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.239.4.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Thu, 7 May 2015 09:57:18 +0800 From: "Xu, HuilongX" To: Zoltan Kiss , "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Olivier Matz , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones Thread-Index: AQHQfPPr/ayVhb7gg0agJKU13vxqvJ1bdbCAgBRhecA= Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 01:57:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1429610122-30943-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <1429696650-9043-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725821420BD6@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <553A1D3B.5040400@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <553A1D3B.5040400@linaro.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 01:57:33 -0000 Hi Olivier, Today I find a compile error, when I test ip fragment on dpdk.org. would yo= u check this? thanks a lot. My dpdk.org commit: a6d71fa7146cc04320c2485d6dde44c1d888d652 The compile error as below: CC main.o /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c: In function 'init_mem': /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: error: 'MBUF_DATA_SIZE' = undeclared (first use in this function) 0, MBUF_DATA_SIZE, socket); ^ /root/dpdk/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c:748:8: note: each undeclared id= entifier is reported only once for each function it appears in Best regards huilong -----Original Message----- From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 6:39 PM To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Olivier Matz; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones Hi, On 22/04/15 12:59, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:57 AM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; zoltan.kiss@linaro.org; Richardson, Bruce; nhor= man@tuxdriver.com; olivier.matz@6wind.com >> Subject: [PATCH v6 00/13] mbuf: enhancements of mbuf clones >> >> The first objective of this series is to fix the support of indirect >> mbufs when the application reserves a private area in mbufs. It also >> removes the limitation that rte_pktmbuf_clone() is only allowed on >> direct (non-cloned) mbufs. The series also contains some enhancements >> and fixes in the mbuf area that makes the implementation of the >> last patches easier. >> > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev When does this series get merged? Regards, Zoltan