RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] deque: add multi-thread unsafe double ended queue

[Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>]

> From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 8:21 PM
> To: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Aditya Ambadipudi <aditya.ambadipudi@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Jack
> Min <jackmin@nvidia.com>; stephen@networkplumber.org; Matan Azrad
> <matan@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>;
> roretzla@linux.microsoft.com; konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com;
> hofors@lysator.liu.se; wathsala.vithanage@arm.com;
> dhruv.tripathi@arm.com; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com; nd@arm.com;
> Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] deque: add multi-thread unsafe double ended
> queue
> 
> Hi Ali,
> 
> Wathsala reached out asking how the checkpatch CI check can be updated so
> that this series passes checkpatch.
> 
> If building the dictionary is a 1 time operation for you, you may have to apply
> this patch and re-run devtools/build-dict.sh so that the new dictionary is in
> place for a V3 of this series.
> 
> It looks like these dictionary exceptions are submitted quite rarely. But, if it
> becomes more common in the future you could look at adding a step to your
> automation which produces a new dictionary every time you run checkpatch,
> based on any additions to the exception list which came with the patch. But
> it's probably not worth the effort with the low volume of word exception
> additions.
> 

Hello,

Applied the change to the dictionary and reran the check.
Still failing because of the GERRIT CHANGE_ID though:
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2024-April/650688.html

Regards,
Ali