DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Singh, Aman Deep" <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: change queue release callback
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:03:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR12MB5373F4FAB5AA9B3AFD4C70F2A1F79@DM4PR12MB5373.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f8178d5-65e5-43f4-fc17-f753183e8042@intel.com>

Hi Singh and Ferruh,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 11:31 PM
> To: Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>; Xueming(Steven) Li
> <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: change queue release callback
> 
> On 8/9/2021 3:39 PM, Singh, Aman Deep wrote:
> > Hi Xueming,
> >
> > On 7/28/2021 1:10 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> >> On 7/27/21 6:41 AM, Xueming Li wrote:
> >>> To align with other eth device queue configuration callbacks, change
> >>> RX and TX queue release callback API parameter from queue object to
> >>> device and queue index.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemingl@nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> In fact, there is no strong reasons to do it, but I think it is a
> >> nice cleanup to use (dev + queue index) on control path.
> >>
> >> Hopefully it will not result in any regressions.
> >
> > Combined there are 100+ API's for Rx/Tx queue_release that need to be
> > modified for it.
> >
> > I believe all regression possibilities here will be caught, in
> > compilation phase itself.
> >
> 
> Same here, it is a good cleanup but there is no strong reason for it.
> 
> Since it is all internal, there is no ABI restriction on the patch, and v21.11 will be full ABI break patches, to not cause conflicts with this
> change, what would you think to have it on v22.02?

This patch is required by shared-rxq feature which ABI broken, target to 21.11.
I'll do it carefully, fortunately, the change is straightforward.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-10  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27  3:41 Xueming Li
2021-07-28  7:40 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-09 14:39   ` Singh, Aman Deep
2021-08-09 15:31     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-10  8:03       ` Xueming(Steven) Li [this message]
2021-08-10  8:54         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-10  9:07           ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-08-11 11:57             ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-08-11 12:13               ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-08-12 14:29                 ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-26 11:25               ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-08-11 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " Xueming Li
2021-09-15 13:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Xueming Li
2021-09-15 13:36   ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-16  8:09   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-16 15:43     ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-16 15:50       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-17  9:40         ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-17  9:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Xueming Li
2021-09-17  9:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: queue release callback optional Xueming Li
2021-09-17 11:29     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-17 11:53       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-17 14:33         ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-17  9:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: change queue release callback Xueming Li
2021-09-17 11:49     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-17 14:31       ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-17 14:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] " Xueming Li
2021-09-17 14:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: make queue release callback optional Xueming Li
2021-09-18  6:44     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-05 22:00       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-17 14:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: change queue release callback Xueming Li
2021-09-18  6:50     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-18 12:39       ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-18 12:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Xueming Li
2021-09-18 12:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: make queue release callback optional Xueming Li
2021-09-21 16:23     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-18 12:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] ethdev: change queue release callback Xueming Li
2021-09-21 18:13     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-22  9:35       ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-22 10:57         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-22 12:54           ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-29 13:57             ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-10-05 16:38               ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-06  7:55                 ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-10-06  8:04                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-06 11:19                     ` Xueming(Steven) Li
     [not found]           ` <2d2e9329b076c022418efd7b38ff280cf3ed1af4.camel@nvidia.com>
     [not found]             ` <56f7537a-bfc0-e4b8-72e8-c382ef0e2dbd@huawei.com>
     [not found]               ` <8e2c2f96265dc17af0564befb3918f1a8ea5154a.camel@nvidia.com>
2021-09-29 14:04                 ` [dpdk-dev] Fwd: " Xueming(Steven) Li
2021-09-30 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Xueming Li
2021-09-30 15:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] ethdev: make queue release callback optional Xueming Li
2021-10-05 22:04     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-30 15:17   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] ethdev: change queue release callback Xueming Li
2021-10-03  7:38     ` Matan Azrad
2021-10-03 21:00       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-06 10:21     ` Somnath Kotur
2021-10-06 11:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Xueming Li
2021-10-06 11:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] ethdev: make queue release callback optional Xueming Li
2021-10-06 15:38     ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-10-08  8:16     ` Xu, Rosen
2021-10-06 11:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] ethdev: change queue release callback Xueming Li
2021-10-06 17:20     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-11  8:28     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-11 13:11       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-06 17:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM4PR12MB5373F4FAB5AA9B3AFD4C70F2A1F79@DM4PR12MB5373.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=xuemingl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).