From: "Naga Harish K, S V" <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
To: "Jayatheerthan, Jay" <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>,
"ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com" <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] kni: optimize alloc queue release
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:38:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB386832AA0583084AE4EBA8C4A1EF9@DM6PR11MB3868.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB43489D87DB2A8D016B98AB4AFDEF9@DM6PR11MB4348.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Jay,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayatheerthan, Jay <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 8:51 PM
> To: Naga Harish K, S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>;
> ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] kni: optimize alloc queue release
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Naga Harish K, S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 8:27 PM
> > To: ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jayatheerthan, Jay <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] kni: optimize alloc queue release
> >
> > the kni alloc queue is filled with physical addresses of mbufs
>
> nitpick: "The" instead of "the".
Updated in v4 patch.
>
> > for kernel consumption. Any unused mbufs in the alloc queue are freed
> > during shutdown sequence in rte_kni_release.
> >
> > In the current existing implementation, for freeing one entry of
>
> nitpick: current and existing are redundant. Can keep one.
Updated in v4 patch.
>
> > alloc queue all the objects of the mempool are traversed. This process
> > is repeated for all the objects of the alloc queue which consumes lot
> > of cpu cycles.
> >
> > Instead of using mempool object iteration method,use
> > ``rte_mem_iova2virt()`` api to get the virtual address for the
> > physical addresses of alloc_q objects.
> > This speeds up the freeing process.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * fix checkpatch errors
> >
> > v3:
> > * fix commit message as per review comments
> > ---
> > lib/kni/rte_kni.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/kni/rte_kni.c index
> > 7971c56bb4..f443e5b2fc 100644
> > --- a/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> > +++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> > @@ -375,26 +375,19 @@ va2pa_all(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf) }
> >
> > static void
> > -obj_free(struct rte_mempool *mp __rte_unused, void *opaque, void
> *obj,
> > - unsigned obj_idx __rte_unused)
> > -{
> > - struct rte_mbuf *m = obj;
> > - void *mbuf_phys = opaque;
> > -
> > - if (va2pa(m) == mbuf_phys)
> > - rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void
> > -kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *mp, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
> > +kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
> > {
> > void *mbuf_phys;
> > int ret;
> > + struct rte_mbuf *m;
> >
> > do {
> > ret = kni_fifo_get(fifo, &mbuf_phys, 1);
> > - if (ret)
> > - rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp, obj_free, mbuf_phys);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + m = (struct rte_mbuf *)
> > + rte_mem_iova2virt((rte_iova_t)mbuf_phys);
> > + rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> > + }
> > } while (ret);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -440,7 +433,7 @@ rte_kni_release(struct rte_kni *kni)
> > if (kni_fifo_count(kni->rx_q))
> > RTE_LOG(ERR, KNI, "Fail to free all Rx-q items\n");
> >
> > - kni_free_fifo_phy(kni->pktmbuf_pool, kni->alloc_q);
> > + kni_free_fifo_phy(kni->alloc_q);
> > kni_free_fifo(kni->tx_q);
> > kni_free_fifo(kni->free_q);
> >
> > --
> > 2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 5:40 [PATCH] " Naga Harish K S V
2022-04-13 5:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Naga Harish K S V
2022-04-13 10:23 ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2022-04-14 10:01 ` Naga Harish K, S V
2022-04-13 14:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Naga Harish K S V
2022-04-14 15:20 ` Jayatheerthan, Jay
2022-04-14 17:38 ` Naga Harish K, S V [this message]
2022-04-14 17:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Naga Harish K S V
2022-05-31 8:32 ` Naga Harish K, S V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB386832AA0583084AE4EBA8C4A1EF9@DM6PR11MB3868.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
--cc=jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).