From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2824DA054D; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:06:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4061606FE; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:06:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90E94067A; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:06:47 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: B9ZJtQ1A6YK+vuU89OQXvOxwM5VGXi1D6RfzT+dZChGHX7uSOhsYX3LAIfB50kWt/ThyOiEJkf iMujpkqgLAQQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9897"; a="247303500" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,184,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="247303500" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2021 08:06:46 -0800 IronPort-SDR: dyVHY14c8yclsOXlqdYKFaGS/7kmvOdWG1IvFT4+Qam9HkMuo7aiO027N4CL04XKQdELO+N5rG 9pT8XCQDAF7A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,184,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="419128957" Received: from orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.229.15]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2021 08:06:43 -0800 Received: from orsmsx611.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.24) by ORSMSX602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:06:43 -0800 Received: from orsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.18) by ORSMSX611.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:06:42 -0800 Received: from orsedg603.ED.cps.intel.com (10.7.248.4) by orsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:06:42 -0800 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.170) by edgegateway.intel.com (134.134.137.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:06:42 -0800 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Rxd0hEcDetsFZaYAA1EKClhUjRPd0YBN9VUKxmoX6RJKh0L37inZsOqtK9wBlhs6gfWxh38rFuJUfR5jh2kNsdXU93PXMg4th92p/dHS9euetVnwB6MrbCrLUdhA0Tmq9hmJdl908Od6FUPiBQSALsYhg0KAxSNNQtiJITJ0uvb62Sys2hK9VnFlBNGhoL+j/Ge4pd6Bg1UNK0E56zuk4o+1zWK3wf8zVoECLtdQ1z8Iboe1ns2OtsIZdeowuIuithT5zTB9v4l4+TSODZmx5i9CLdQpv9PkaChKdhO0t+DCtrnsdpzfShSWGIS8dvXMVEmsmoGZfRN7Mrvuk+mQdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=X1chV4tu8gslGAtQRBtVYybsy+z7u2in0gbUgU5eGow=; b=kx9vjT8XxfnIQhhNCM81u5+qmujSmtBHBRDdPzvN3JrULFe9SNNOzgUFLRSfPgHDbQTs8Nb/8CNQ/qB6vHJNTVp7pMG10j1Lz5R0VvMfwoIalCThju/msfaAvXzyxAqJrV7sd1txFxnKTnJ8mg2SR46uvxsZ8njED53sPEoTtYyPJzU8xeM7ig7h/07ST3MmDAzQVqkW6xy9x+N7gMOwRjoLJW3lud3l818LWfWre3FjCWEW5/Z/A1qBeenPxmC8zJt3ozzDE3UeSb3Oy/CW+OohsDtColXQ1+fLo2uv1DerTv7iegqwQ/8VCasJgg0xSAIvkVOmQKd/MpHQJD5iCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=X1chV4tu8gslGAtQRBtVYybsy+z7u2in0gbUgU5eGow=; b=QeEdsLN86bCdUecQZ6vk3ElNdVdSWLhGymGIRojMJq19J+GOPNr5PhJPJWEMXA4p+d0om+/9HLqOtoND+Y+a+azJcp/dpDOq+zn5Yd2uejrAnWZ+Jj4FFo6WwmSBAM4bsqiihL7MUQolF5tf1l4SnTPqBg8ojW1VtQkrUqz4rbU= Received: from DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:204::26) by DM5PR1101MB2188.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:53::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3846.29; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:06:41 +0000 Received: from DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4cf9:4be7:3c95:6bcd]) by DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4cf9:4be7:3c95:6bcd%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3846.042; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:06:41 +0000 From: "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> CC: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>, "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>, "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "spdk@lists.01.org" <spdk@lists.01.org> Thread-Topic: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab Thread-Index: AQHW/i4pvkrl42wuTUiTdhBQkS2lNKpOabJggAAGwQCAAAXFQIABeb9dgAAO6YCAAB4FAIAC5BrxgAFAHBCAAI6IgIAEkmtygAMtGAA= Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:06:41 +0000 Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4220052EE3CECE88C4A97710EE869@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> References: <f7ta6se7fh7.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> <DM6PR11MB4220733693776AA1B8BE91A9EE8F9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOE1vsPC-D-5Rnc08fJDqrpcjeK1oYbaPsp1B72h2Pueyby0TA@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB422097059AB558056B97BEC5EE8F9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <f7th7ml5l6o.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> <CAOeXdva_KdVOqmVTWaECKTRRgWpXjX+_RuT6d5vFB5FGy3DhCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOeXdvZrTJu0bCoe8hXEGqDRDwJ-PBZcrbjg723M6TxSB1mw1w@mail.gmail.com> <f7tk0re1z4a.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> <DM6PR11MB4220748A0C219E31BB33B2BDEE8B9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOeXdvYPWmMSeGjFok-vkgwP9y-tYZj=-G5cxqZZWC0-1mBB5Q@mail.gmail.com> <f7t4kidbbat.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <f7t4kidbbat.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 authentication-results: redhat.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;redhat.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=intel.com; x-originating-ip: [87.207.29.133] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 34a06581-45f7-46ef-b3ad-08d8d35e03aa x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR1101MB2188: x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR1101MB21881CDC6DAF9B1F97707109EE869@DM5PR1101MB2188.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(86362001)(66446008)(316002)(4326008)(966005)(76116006)(9686003)(66556008)(55016002)(7696005)(66946007)(66476007)(33656002)(5660300002)(478600001)(2906002)(54906003)(71200400001)(26005)(8676002)(110136005)(52536014)(186003)(64756008)(6506007)(15974865002)(8936002)(83380400001)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?zuHzy9iE7BcNMGarMgZzCX4zKRKFM43I3MCX6guTQQE7hjusN0LSqvpAU1az?= =?us-ascii?Q?k1UR5FDYPNbagH3axdfF7p4vv5fIVFLK2rcjwrx0yqYkTFj7nYO/nCriIfgE?= =?us-ascii?Q?+I3cO33Dn6Cw8WLZ6MxVkMDWv5RMO8v1T388AN2z5f19/EXh5Y4l0Rl1+iPI?= =?us-ascii?Q?muQlnu1ozgrFo/a7NomSFJf4zfR6IQxpPd+4QRDxLfSx1yPErq8tMVvm0E89?= =?us-ascii?Q?1xUkooq7MbDd12qP9Cq2YuSwMtEWlz6b1ZEYPdlM1J+vZhZuubumU0e0IDQf?= =?us-ascii?Q?7L7SKIgKqXZV34tuFB6BqOo15hrP8VSNPzoQOsfGmv81bRLPXyoXaSV44xYh?= =?us-ascii?Q?DrfZ1BsSa56/4JAowo9A9LWTxXMsQD7hMyhQs/fHhi3V0y6r39THdUhvL/wK?= =?us-ascii?Q?5H3KfzL5zlo1Iy/XWnfLIJffY58Fv7o+ZN77BqfuFuL6ZBaYvJyf1F8fLX+n?= =?us-ascii?Q?Gp+bmUu5xC9m//7XZEP+ivir0GQjAOqkRz84h+S4lBPOoVJiCA674w0ltR6x?= =?us-ascii?Q?93IXBbmegdgpu1mESlj3jClTMSTQ34zGSyBZloVnrM1+clpzHlRpQKjq+gaI?= =?us-ascii?Q?18jmNCq38orAlfz9v1GbdhjNxr7jBfGFspPs4XPQ0bW8EFF38dKx3ZZk1e/i?= =?us-ascii?Q?QRBSz770im6ubg4LVHjn+iBfzCL/uP2VyZN2d9Xb8XqLwjKxJG30B4JWzxkG?= =?us-ascii?Q?tbrWe4w47WjspqOkZEMLw79fgIFyxIcNPzUWXchgSXnoTYchOflIKBWzrFSS?= =?us-ascii?Q?fpFEdwqykWb6SPZdCpe/mcl7rS3XL7m6G+PciEhmbhcMBnjX11LWIRvP4u4u?= =?us-ascii?Q?mxVI/WhOB8EgWnizb3QJAbWxobgJtdDBSalVsq16hY3rt9mMiVN+KcfMklmX?= =?us-ascii?Q?DXbV3s3s1yFyeqZ7MwwvyeexRF2DaAOv/AuFPilFJalzudHBC9wWdML0hoE1?= =?us-ascii?Q?x7laWQCk2Lm42HEMjExCBtDqjGTBt9L2I3nm05x1Fa6vCqFTcEEO93dvIFSZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?vzx/I4QL3VA3XLgJthOd9p0xikvtlpW0GD7zAmn7TRNS1FssqUuGg8tqsYRn?= =?us-ascii?Q?Wea9S8Bc2lIt5vxTdUI1XaQUGI/RTeCbo3feHkEBh/RUj4EkXYbpDhKoDXmd?= =?us-ascii?Q?6ui2J0RXbKz7cY0lt7J2jdYWLKmsP5bU/AQnd/oGW1t6qvnHRzeebnvLKqTp?= =?us-ascii?Q?8vHCegjqgEY2S3PFYVZGXC0g3rFs9ni2DqT3Hb5sjU9xiQ+v1grInBVu3STS?= =?us-ascii?Q?J3mwtlB9Db29ajzo30BDEKOfJ1AEYr0OJb23XFcwD5APxoTIJ3gpycU5oYoF?= =?us-ascii?Q?etVMgXmLyfSTYScpgLXBPLf8?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 34a06581-45f7-46ef-b3ad-08d8d35e03aa X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Feb 2021 16:06:41.4070 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: FzU/6/jqgGy0/l2BB32ot2BF1SqrFpN64KHaZ6cjaqf7gBxBL+DG6v5nIkT3AfJLMaTAXZnfILeoOBwO6Ki3lgt5njJ17soFMGrngIIYD3Y= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR1101MB2188 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Hi folks, Patch in question is now part of v21.01.x branch and tests in UNH lab can m= ake use of it. https://github.com/spdk/spdk/commit/14eeeea669010247fa8d6c7ce53b2e69fcfaa85= 8 If possible, removing '--without-vhost' would be best going forward. Then S= PDK compilation tests would cover rte_vhost too. Thanks, Tomek > -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 4:28 PM > To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> > Cc: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>; Lincoln Lavoie > <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; > spdk@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation fai= lures > @ DPDK community lab >=20 > Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> writes: >=20 > > Hi Tomek, > > > > I do not think we have a specific reason for disabling vhost. I can > > look into enabling it and get back to you on that. >=20 > I did a test, but I had to hack up the dockerfile and compile script a bi= t. >=20 > I removed the '--without-vhost' (I also modified it to pull dpdk and SPDK= from > their respective 'main'/'master' branches). The build completed successf= ully. >=20 > I will update the BZ with this information. Can you try testing with the= '-- > without-vhost' removed from the compile_spdk.sh line, and if that is > successful we can modify the job and re-enable? >=20 > > Thanks, > > Brandon > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 4:18 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz > > <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> As Aaron noted this was result of rte_ethdev depending on rte_net. > >> On SPDK side rte_net was included in default compilation with vhost > >> component, but since vhost is disabled in the UNH lab tests with SPDK > >> it showed up as missing. A fix for that is now submitted to > >> SPDK: > >> https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6398 > >> I'll let you know when it makes it's way to the v21.01.x branch. > >> > >> @Brandon Lo General question, is there particular reason to disable > >> vhost [configure argument '--without-vhost'] in the UNH lab tests > >> with SPDK ? > >> I don't recall any identified issue and enabling it would increase > >> the coverage of the compilation tests. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tomek > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> > >> > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 3:02 PM > >> > To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> > >> > Cc: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>; Lincoln Lavoie > >> > <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > >> > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > >> > Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK > >> > compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > >> > > >> > Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> writes: > >> > > >> > > Hi again everyone, > >> > > > >> > > I have checked the pipelines with SPDK branch v21.01.x on the > >> > > main DPDK > >> > branch. > >> > > It still seems to have an issue with compilation, and I have > >> > > attached a log of a Fedora SPDK compilation. > >> > > There are some undefined references to "rte_ether_unformat_addr" > >> > > I will continue to look into this. If you have any ideas on how > >> > > to fix this, please let me know. > >> > > >> > Looks like rte_ethdev depends on rte_net - maybe I missed something. > >> > > >> > Brandon, can we disable this test for the time being since it's > >> > been failing for a while now? Can you also send me the container > >> > image / definitions you're using so that I can help work on this? > >> > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Brandon > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:07 AM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> > >> > >> I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few > >> > >> pipelines to make sure everything goes smoothly. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks for the update, > >> > >> Brandon > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole > >> > >> <aconole@redhat.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > "Zawadzki, Tomasz" <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> writes: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Hi Lincoln, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even > >> > >> > from a few hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some > >> > >> > adjustment, > >> > too? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against > >> > >> > > dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if > >> > >> > > this is what you are seeing on your end too. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Thanks, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Tomek > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> > >> > >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM > >> > >> > > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> > >> > >> > > Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; Brandon Lo > >> > >> > > <blo@iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > >> > >> > > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation > >> > >> > > failures @ DPDK community lab > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Thanks Tomek, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make > >> > >> > > sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next > >> > >> > > failure is. :-P > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Cheers, > >> > >> > > Lincoln > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz > >> > <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Hi Aaron, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Thank you for reporting this ! > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on > >> > >> > > rte_ethdev, which > >> > was resolved on latest SPDK. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK > >> > >> > > branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK > >> > >> > > release, would be v21.01.x: > >> > >> > > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be > >> > >> > > merged > >> > shortly: > >> > >> > > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Thanks, > >> > >> > > Tomek > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev > >> > >> > > <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole > > >> > >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM > To: Brandon Lo > >> > >> > > <blo@iol.unh.edu> > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > >> > >> > > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] > >> > >> > > SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > > > >> > >> > > Greetings, > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation > >> > >> > > in the UNH community lab seems > to be failing, and I don't > >> > >> > > see an obvious reason for the > >> > failure. > >> > >> > > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there > >> > >> > > is a symbol that isn't > available when linking. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Job details (for example): > >> > >> > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results- > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_fil > >> > >> > > e/20 > > >> > >> > > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the > >> > >> > > compilation of > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the > >> > >> > > compiler > >> > for the specific object? > >> > >> > > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong? > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > >> > > > -Aaron > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> > >> > >> Brandon Lo > >> > >> > >> > >> UNH InterOperability Laboratory > >> > >> > >> > >> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 > >> > >> > >> > >> blo@iol.unh.edu > >> > >> > >> > >> www.iol.unh.edu > >>