From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bpf: delete meaningless code
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:29:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB44912A4B869C4811D69CEF1E9A469@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <645182d8-0ed4-185f-1f72-c96ae82e34e8@huawei.com>
>
> 在 2021/4/21 19:43, Ananyev, Konstantin 写道:
> >>
> >> 'rd->u.max = rd->u.max' is meaningless which should be deleted.
> >>
> >> This patch fixed it.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8021917293d0 ("bpf: add extra validation for input BPF program")
> >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > As I remember, I did it on purpose.
> > Some old (but still supported) version of clang complained
> > about unitialized variable.
>
> Well, how about like this ?
> uint64_t tmp = rd->u.max;
> if (op == BPF_MOD)
> tmp = RTE_MIN(tmp, tmp - 1);
> rd->u.max = tmp;
Then, I think it should be:
tmp = RTE_MIN(tmp, rs->u.max - 1);
Or just leave things as they are right now.
Nothing is broken here.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c | 2 --
> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
> >> index 9214f15..c5ad951 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
> >> @@ -517,8 +517,6 @@ eval_divmod(uint32_t op, struct bpf_reg_val *rd, struct bpf_reg_val *rs,
> >> } else {
> >> if (op == BPF_MOD)
> >> rd->u.max = RTE_MIN(rd->u.max, rs->u.max - 1);
> >> - else
> >> - rd->u.max = rd->u.max;
> >> rd->u.min = 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >
> > .
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 11:35 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 11:43 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-21 12:02 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-22 11:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2021-04-22 11:39 ` Min Hu (Connor)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB44912A4B869C4811D69CEF1E9A469@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).