From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Chilikin, Andrey" <andrey.chilikin@intel.com>,
"Kinsella, Ray" <ray.kinsella@intel.com>,
"Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
"Gobriel, Sameh" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] hash: add predictable RSS implementation
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:53:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB4491B58CD26988E83EC504C69A759@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617738643-258635-3-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
Hi Vladimir,
Few comments below, mostly minor.
One generic one - doc seems missing.
With that in place:
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>
> This patch implements predictable RSS functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.c | 577 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h | 42 ++++
> lib/librte_hash/version.map | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 602 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.c
> index 79e8724..cc60ada 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,45 @@
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
>
> #define THASH_NAME_LEN 64
> +#define TOEPLITZ_HASH_LEN 32
> +
> +#define RETA_SZ_MIN 2U
> +#define RETA_SZ_MAX 16U
Should these RETA_SZ defines be in public header?
So user can know what are allowed values?
> +#define RETA_SZ_IN_RANGE(reta_sz) ((reta_sz >= RETA_SZ_MIN) && \
> + (reta_sz <= RETA_SZ_MAX))
> +
> +TAILQ_HEAD(rte_thash_list, rte_tailq_entry);
> +static struct rte_tailq_elem rte_thash_tailq = {
> + .name = "RTE_THASH",
> +};
> +EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(rte_thash_tailq)
> +
> +/**
> + * Table of some irreducible polinomials over GF(2).
> + * For lfsr they are reperesented in BE bit order, and
> + * x^0 is masked out.
> + * For example, poly x^5 + x^2 + 1 will be represented
> + * as (101001b & 11111b) = 01001b = 0x9
> + */
> +static const uint32_t irreducible_poly_table[][4] = {
> + {0, 0, 0, 0}, /** < degree 0 */
> + {1, 1, 1, 1}, /** < degree 1 */
> + {0x3, 0x3, 0x3, 0x3}, /** < degree 2 and so on... */
> + {0x5, 0x3, 0x5, 0x3},
> + {0x9, 0x3, 0x9, 0x3},
> + {0x9, 0x1b, 0xf, 0x5},
> + {0x21, 0x33, 0x1b, 0x2d},
> + {0x41, 0x11, 0x71, 0x9},
> + {0x71, 0xa9, 0xf5, 0x8d},
> + {0x21, 0xd1, 0x69, 0x1d9},
> + {0x81, 0x2c1, 0x3b1, 0x185},
> + {0x201, 0x541, 0x341, 0x461},
> + {0x941, 0x609, 0xe19, 0x45d},
> + {0x1601, 0x1f51, 0x1171, 0x359},
> + {0x2141, 0x2111, 0x2db1, 0x2109},
> + {0x4001, 0x801, 0x101, 0x7301},
> + {0x7781, 0xa011, 0x4211, 0x86d9},
> +};
>
> struct thash_lfsr {
> uint32_t ref_cnt;
> @@ -31,8 +70,10 @@ struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper {
> char name[THASH_NAME_LEN]; /** < Name of subtuple configuration */
> LIST_ENTRY(rte_thash_subtuple_helper) next;
> struct thash_lfsr *lfsr;
> - uint32_t offset; /** < Offset in bits of the subtuple */
> - uint32_t len; /** < Length in bits of the subtuple */
> + uint32_t offset; /** < Offset of the m-sequence */
> + uint32_t len; /** < Length of the m-sequence */
> + uint32_t tuple_offset; /** < Offset in bits of the subtuple */
> + uint32_t tuple_len; /** < Length in bits of the subtuple */
> uint32_t lsb_msk; /** < (1 << reta_sz_log) - 1 */
> __extension__ uint32_t compl_table[0] __rte_cache_aligned;
> /** < Complimentary table */
> @@ -48,49 +89,549 @@ struct rte_thash_ctx {
> uint8_t hash_key[0];
> };
>
> +static inline uint32_t
> +get_bit_lfsr(struct thash_lfsr *lfsr)
> +{
> + uint32_t bit, ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * masking the TAP bits defined by the polynomial and
> + * calculating parity
> + */
> + bit = __builtin_popcount(lfsr->state & lfsr->poly) & 0x1;
> + ret = lfsr->state & 0x1;
> + lfsr->state = ((lfsr->state >> 1) | (bit << (lfsr->deg - 1))) &
> + ((1 << lfsr->deg) - 1);
> +
> + lfsr->bits_cnt++;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +get_rev_bit_lfsr(struct thash_lfsr *lfsr)
> +{
> + uint32_t bit, ret;
> +
> + bit = __builtin_popcount(lfsr->rev_state & lfsr->rev_poly) & 0x1;
> + ret = lfsr->rev_state & (1 << (lfsr->deg - 1));
> + lfsr->rev_state = ((lfsr->rev_state << 1) | bit) &
> + ((1 << lfsr->deg) - 1);
> +
> + lfsr->bits_cnt++;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +thash_get_rand_poly(uint32_t poly_degree)
> +{
> + return irreducible_poly_table[poly_degree][rte_rand() %
> + RTE_DIM(irreducible_poly_table[poly_degree])];
> +}
> +
> +static struct thash_lfsr *
> +alloc_lfsr(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + struct thash_lfsr *lfsr;
> + uint32_t i;
> +
> + if (ctx == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + lfsr = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct thash_lfsr), 0);
> + if (lfsr == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + lfsr->deg = ctx->reta_sz_log;
> + lfsr->poly = thash_get_rand_poly(lfsr->deg);
> + do {
> + lfsr->state = rte_rand() & ((1 << lfsr->deg) - 1);
> + } while (lfsr->state == 0);
> + /* init reverse order polynomial */
> + lfsr->rev_poly = (lfsr->poly >> 1) | (1 << (lfsr->deg - 1));
> + /* init proper rev_state*/
> + lfsr->rev_state = lfsr->state;
> + for (i = 0; i <= lfsr->deg; i++)
> + get_rev_bit_lfsr(lfsr);
> +
> + /* clear bits_cnt after rev_state was inited */
> + lfsr->bits_cnt = 0;
> + lfsr->ref_cnt = 1;
> +
> + return lfsr;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +attach_lfsr(struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h, struct thash_lfsr *lfsr)
> +{
> + lfsr->ref_cnt++;
> + h->lfsr = lfsr;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +free_lfsr(struct thash_lfsr *lfsr)
> +{
> + lfsr->ref_cnt--;
> + if (lfsr->ref_cnt == 0)
> + rte_free(lfsr);
> +}
> +
> struct rte_thash_ctx *
> -rte_thash_init_ctx(const char *name __rte_unused,
> - uint32_t key_len __rte_unused, uint32_t reta_sz __rte_unused,
> - uint8_t *key __rte_unused, uint32_t flags __rte_unused)
> +rte_thash_init_ctx(const char *name, uint32_t key_len, uint32_t reta_sz,
> + uint8_t *key, uint32_t flags)
> {
> + struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx;
> + struct rte_tailq_entry *te;
> + struct rte_thash_list *thash_list;
> + uint32_t i;
Empty line is missing.
> + if ((name == NULL) || (key_len == 0) || !RETA_SZ_IN_RANGE(reta_sz)) {
> + rte_errno = EINVAL;
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + thash_list = RTE_TAILQ_CAST(rte_thash_tailq.head, rte_thash_list);
> +
> + rte_mcfg_tailq_write_lock();
> +
> + /* guarantee there's no existing */
> + TAILQ_FOREACH(te, thash_list, next) {
> + ctx = (struct rte_thash_ctx *)te->data;
> + if (strncmp(name, ctx->name, sizeof(ctx->name)) == 0)
> + break;
> + }
> + ctx = NULL;
> + if (te != NULL) {
> + rte_errno = EEXIST;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + /* allocate tailq entry */
> + te = rte_zmalloc("THASH_TAILQ_ENTRY", sizeof(*te), 0);
> + if (te == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH,
> + "Can not allocate tailq entry for thash context %s\n",
> + name);
> + rte_errno = ENOMEM;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + ctx = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct rte_thash_ctx) + key_len, 0);
> + if (ctx == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "thash ctx %s memory allocation failed\n",
> + name);
> + rte_errno = ENOMEM;
> + goto free_te;
> + }
> +
> + rte_strlcpy(ctx->name, name, sizeof(ctx->name));
> + ctx->key_len = key_len;
> + ctx->reta_sz_log = reta_sz;
> + LIST_INIT(&ctx->head);
> + ctx->flags = flags;
> +
> + if (key)
> + rte_memcpy(ctx->hash_key, key, key_len);
> + else {
> + for (i = 0; i < key_len; i++)
> + ctx->hash_key[i] = rte_rand();
> + }
> +
> + te->data = (void *)ctx;
> + TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(thash_list, te, next);
> +
> + rte_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock();
> +
> + return ctx;
> +free_te:
> + rte_free(te);
> +exit:
> + rte_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock();
> return NULL;
> }
>
> struct rte_thash_ctx *
> -rte_thash_find_existing(const char *name __rte_unused)
> +rte_thash_find_existing(const char *name)
> {
> - return NULL;
> + struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx;
> + struct rte_tailq_entry *te;
> + struct rte_thash_list *thash_list;
> +
> + thash_list = RTE_TAILQ_CAST(rte_thash_tailq.head, rte_thash_list);
> +
> + rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
> + TAILQ_FOREACH(te, thash_list, next) {
> + ctx = (struct rte_thash_ctx *)te->data;
> + if (strncmp(name, ctx->name, sizeof(ctx->name)) == 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
> +
> + if (te == NULL) {
> + rte_errno = ENOENT;
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return ctx;
> }
>
> void
> -rte_thash_free_ctx(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx __rte_unused)
> +rte_thash_free_ctx(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx)
> {
> + struct rte_tailq_entry *te;
> + struct rte_thash_list *thash_list;
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *ent, *tmp;
> +
> + if (ctx == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + thash_list = RTE_TAILQ_CAST(rte_thash_tailq.head, rte_thash_list);
> + rte_mcfg_tailq_write_lock();
> + TAILQ_FOREACH(te, thash_list, next) {
> + if (te->data == (void *)ctx)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (te != NULL)
> + TAILQ_REMOVE(thash_list, te, next);
> +
> + rte_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock();
> + ent = LIST_FIRST(&(ctx->head));
> + while (ent) {
> + free_lfsr(ent->lfsr);
> + tmp = ent;
> + ent = LIST_NEXT(ent, next);
> + LIST_REMOVE(tmp, next);
> + rte_free(tmp);
> + }
> +
> + rte_free(ctx);
> + rte_free(te);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +set_bit(uint8_t *ptr, uint32_t bit, uint32_t pos)
> +{
> + uint32_t byte_idx = pos >> 3;
Just as a nit to be consistent with the line below:
pos / CHAR_BIT;
> + uint32_t bit_idx = (CHAR_BIT - 1) - (pos & (CHAR_BIT - 1));
> + uint8_t tmp;
> +
> + tmp = ptr[byte_idx];
> + tmp &= ~(1 << bit_idx);
> + tmp |= bit << bit_idx;
> + ptr[byte_idx] = tmp;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * writes m-sequence to the hash_key for range [start, end]
> + * (i.e. including start and end positions)
> + */
> +static int
> +generate_subkey(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx, struct thash_lfsr *lfsr,
> + uint32_t start, uint32_t end)
> +{
> + uint32_t i;
> + uint32_t req_bits = (start < end) ? (end - start) : (start - end);
> + req_bits++; /* due to incuding end */
> +
> + /* check if lfsr overflow period of the m-sequence */
> + if (((lfsr->bits_cnt + req_bits) > (1ULL << lfsr->deg) - 1) &&
> + ((ctx->flags & RTE_THASH_IGNORE_PERIOD_OVERFLOW) !=
> + RTE_THASH_IGNORE_PERIOD_OVERFLOW))
> + return -ENOSPC;
> +
> + if (start < end) {
> + /* original direction (from left to right)*/
> + for (i = start; i <= end; i++)
> + set_bit(ctx->hash_key, get_bit_lfsr(lfsr), i);
> +
> + } else {
> + /* reverse direction (from right to left) */
> + for (i = end; i >= start; i--)
> + set_bit(ctx->hash_key, get_rev_bit_lfsr(lfsr), i);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +get_subvalue(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx, uint32_t offset)
> +{
> + uint32_t *tmp, val;
> +
> + tmp = (uint32_t *)(&ctx->hash_key[offset >> 3]);
> + val = rte_be_to_cpu_32(*tmp);
> + val >>= (TOEPLITZ_HASH_LEN - ((offset & (CHAR_BIT - 1)) +
> + ctx->reta_sz_log));
> +
> + return val & ((1 << ctx->reta_sz_log) - 1);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +generate_compliment_table(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h)
> +{
> + int i, j, k;
> + uint32_t val;
> + uint32_t start;
> +
> + start = h->offset + h->len - (2 * ctx->reta_sz_log - 1);
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < (1 << ctx->reta_sz_log); i++) {
> + val = 0;
> + for (j = i; j; j &= (j - 1)) {
> + k = rte_bsf32(j);
> + val ^= get_subvalue(ctx, start - k +
> + ctx->reta_sz_log - 1);
> + }
> + h->compl_table[val] = i;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +insert_before(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *ent,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *cur_ent,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *next_ent,
> + uint32_t start, uint32_t end, uint32_t range_end)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (end < cur_ent->offset) {
> + ent->lfsr = alloc_lfsr(ctx);
> + if (ent->lfsr == NULL) {
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + /* generate nonoverlapping range [start, end) */
> + ret = generate_subkey(ctx, ent->lfsr, start, end - 1);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + free_lfsr(ent->lfsr);
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else if ((next_ent != NULL) && (end > next_ent->offset)) {
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> + attach_lfsr(ent, cur_ent->lfsr);
> +
> + /**
> + * generate partially overlapping range
> + * [start, cur_ent->start) in reverse order
> + */
> + ret = generate_subkey(ctx, ent->lfsr, cur_ent->offset - 1, start);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + free_lfsr(ent->lfsr);
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (end > range_end) {
> + /**
> + * generate partially overlapping range
> + * (range_end, end)
> + */
> + ret = generate_subkey(ctx, ent->lfsr, range_end, end - 1);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + free_lfsr(ent->lfsr);
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + LIST_INSERT_BEFORE(cur_ent, ent, next);
> + generate_compliment_table(ctx, ent);
> + ctx->subtuples_nb++;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int
> +insert_after(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *ent,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *cur_ent,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *next_ent,
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *prev_ent,
> + uint32_t end, uint32_t range_end)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if ((next_ent != NULL) && (end > next_ent->offset)) {
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
> +
> + attach_lfsr(ent, cur_ent->lfsr);
> + if (end > range_end) {
> + /**
> + * generate partially overlapping range
> + * (range_end, end)
> + */
> + ret = generate_subkey(ctx, ent->lfsr, range_end, end - 1);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + free_lfsr(ent->lfsr);
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + LIST_INSERT_AFTER(prev_ent, ent, next);
> + generate_compliment_table(ctx, ent);
> + ctx->subtuples_nb++;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int
> -rte_thash_add_helper(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx __rte_unused,
> - const char *name __rte_unused, uint32_t len __rte_unused,
> - uint32_t offset __rte_unused)
> +rte_thash_add_helper(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx, const char *name, uint32_t len,
> + uint32_t offset)
> {
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *ent, *cur_ent, *prev_ent, *next_ent;
> + uint32_t start, end;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if ((ctx == NULL) || (name == NULL) || (len < ctx->reta_sz_log) ||
> + ((offset + len + TOEPLITZ_HASH_LEN - 1) >
> + ctx->key_len * CHAR_BIT))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Check for existing name*/
> + LIST_FOREACH(cur_ent, &ctx->head, next) {
> + if (strncmp(name, cur_ent->name, sizeof(cur_ent->name)) == 0)
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
> +
> + end = offset + len + TOEPLITZ_HASH_LEN - 1;
> + start = ((ctx->flags & RTE_THASH_MINIMAL_SEQ) ==
> + RTE_THASH_MINIMAL_SEQ) ? (end - (2 * ctx->reta_sz_log - 1)) :
> + offset;
> +
> + ent = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper) +
> + sizeof(uint32_t) * (1 << ctx->reta_sz_log), 0);
Helper can be used by data-path code (via rte_thash_get_compliment()) right?
Then might be better to align it at cache-line.
> + if (ent == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + rte_strlcpy(ent->name, name, sizeof(ent->name));
> + ent->offset = start;
> + ent->len = end - start;
> + ent->tuple_offset = offset;
> + ent->tuple_len = len;
> + ent->lsb_msk = (1 << ctx->reta_sz_log) - 1;
> +
> + cur_ent = LIST_FIRST(&ctx->head);
> + while (cur_ent) {
> + uint32_t range_end = cur_ent->offset + cur_ent->len;
> + next_ent = LIST_NEXT(cur_ent, next);
> + prev_ent = cur_ent;
> + /* Iterate through overlapping ranges */
> + while ((next_ent != NULL) && (next_ent->offset < range_end)) {
> + range_end = RTE_MAX(next_ent->offset + next_ent->len,
> + range_end);
> + if (start > next_ent->offset)
> + prev_ent = next_ent;
> +
> + next_ent = LIST_NEXT(next_ent, next);
> + }
> +
> + if (start < cur_ent->offset)
> + return insert_before(ctx, ent, cur_ent, next_ent,
> + start, end, range_end);
> + else if (start < range_end)
> + return insert_after(ctx, ent, cur_ent, next_ent,
> + prev_ent, end, range_end);
> +
> + cur_ent = next_ent;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + ent->lfsr = alloc_lfsr(ctx);
> + if (ent->lfsr == NULL) {
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + /* generate nonoverlapping range [start, end) */
> + ret = generate_subkey(ctx, ent->lfsr, start, end - 1);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + free_lfsr(ent->lfsr);
> + rte_free(ent);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + if (LIST_EMPTY(&ctx->head)) {
> + LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ctx->head, ent, next);
> + } else {
> + LIST_FOREACH(next_ent, &ctx->head, next)
> + prev_ent = next_ent;
> +
> + LIST_INSERT_AFTER(prev_ent, ent, next);
> + }
> + generate_compliment_table(ctx, ent);
> + ctx->subtuples_nb++;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *
> -rte_thash_get_helper(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx __rte_unused,
> - const char *name __rte_unused)
> +rte_thash_get_helper(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx, const char *name)
> {
> + struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *ent;
> +
> + if ((ctx == NULL) || (name == NULL))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + LIST_FOREACH(ent, &ctx->head, next) {
> + if (strncmp(name, ent->name, sizeof(ent->name)) == 0)
> + return ent;
> + }
> +
> return NULL;
> }
>
> uint32_t
> -rte_thash_get_compliment(struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h __rte_unused,
> - uint32_t hash __rte_unused, uint32_t desired_hash __rte_unused)
> +rte_thash_get_compliment(struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h,
> + uint32_t hash, uint32_t desired_hash)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return h->compl_table[(hash ^ desired_hash) & h->lsb_msk];
> }
Would it make sense to add another-one for multi values:
rte_thash_get_compliment(uint32_t hash, const uint32_t desired_hashes[], uint32_t adj_hash[], uint32_t num);
So user can get adjustment values for multiple queues at once?
>
> const uint8_t *
> -rte_thash_get_key(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx __rte_unused)
> +rte_thash_get_key(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx)
> {
> - return NULL;
> + return ctx->hash_key;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +xor_bit(uint8_t *ptr, uint32_t bit, uint32_t pos)
> +{
> + uint32_t byte_idx = pos >> 3;
> + uint32_t bit_idx = (CHAR_BIT - 1) - (pos & (CHAR_BIT - 1));
> + uint8_t tmp;
> +
> + tmp = ptr[byte_idx];
> + tmp ^= bit << bit_idx;
> + ptr[byte_idx] = tmp;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +rte_thash_adjust_tuple(struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h,
> + uint8_t *orig_tuple, uint32_t adj_bits,
> + rte_thash_check_tuple_t fn, void *userdata)
> +{
> + unsigned i;
> +
> + if ((h == NULL) || (orig_tuple == NULL))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + adj_bits &= h->lsb_msk;
> + /* Hint: LSB of adj_bits corresponds to offset + len bit of tuple */
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(uint32_t) * CHAR_BIT; i++) {
> + uint8_t bit = (adj_bits >> i) & 0x1;
> + if (bit)
> + xor_bit(orig_tuple, bit,
> + h->tuple_offset + h->tuple_len - 1 - i);
> + }
> +
> + if (fn != NULL)
> + return (fn(userdata, orig_tuple)) ? 0 : -EEXIST;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
Not sure is there much point to have a callback that is called only once.
Might be better to rework the function in a way that user to provide 2 callbacks -
one to generate new value, second to check.
Something like that:
int
rte_thash_gen_tuple(struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h,
uint8_t *tuple, uint32_t desired_hash,
int (*cb_gen_tuple)(uint8_t *, void *),
int (*cb_check_tuple)(const uint8_t *, void *),
void *userdata)
{
do {
rc = cb_gen_tuple(tuple, userdata);
if (rc != 0)
return rc;
hash = rte_softrss(tuple, ...);
adj = rte_thash_get_compliment(h, hash, desired_hash);
update_tuple(tuple, adj, ...);
rc = cb_check_tuple(tuple, userdata);
} while(rc != 0);
return rc;
}
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h
> index 38a641b..fd67931 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_thash.h
> @@ -360,6 +360,48 @@ __rte_experimental
> const uint8_t *
> rte_thash_get_key(struct rte_thash_ctx *ctx);
>
> +/**
> + * Function prototype for the rte_thash_adjust_tuple
> + * to check if adjusted tuple could be used.
> + * Generally it is some kind of lookup function to check
> + * if adjusted tuple is already in use.
> + *
> + * @param userdata
> + * Pointer to the userdata. It could be a pointer to the
> + * table with used tuples to search.
> + * @param tuple
> + * Pointer to the tuple to check
> + *
> + * @return
> + * 1 on success
> + * 0 otherwise
> + */
> +typedef int (*rte_thash_check_tuple_t)(void *userdata, uint8_t *tuple);
> +
> +/**
> + * Adjust tuple with complimentary bits.
> + *
> + * @param h
> + * Pointer to the helper struct
> + * @param orig_tuple
> + * Pointer to the tuple to be adjusted
> + * @param adj_bits
> + * Valure returned by rte_thash_get_compliment
> + * @param fn
> + * Callback function to check adjusted tuple. Could be NULL
> + * @param userdata
> + * Pointer to the userdata to be passed to fn(). Could be NULL
> + *
> + * @return
> + * 0 on success
> + * negative otherwise
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_thash_adjust_tuple(struct rte_thash_subtuple_helper *h,
> + uint8_t *orig_tuple, uint32_t adj_bits,
> + rte_thash_check_tuple_t fn, void *userdata);
> +
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/version.map b/lib/librte_hash/version.map
> index 93cb230..a992a1e 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/version.map
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/version.map
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ DPDK_21 {
> EXPERIMENTAL {
> global:
>
> + rte_thash_adjust_tuple;
> rte_hash_free_key_with_position;
> rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk;
> rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data;
> --
> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-16 18:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] Predictable RSS feature Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-03-16 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] hash: add predictable RSS API Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-03-16 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/3] hash: add predictable RSS implementation Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-03-16 18:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/3] test/hash: add additional thash tests Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-06 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Predictable RSS feature Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-08 15:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-11 18:51 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-10-22 20:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-24 14:42 ` Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-10 0:32 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-04-11 18:51 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-04-11 19:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-13 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-14 18:04 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-04-15 8:29 ` David Marchand
2021-04-19 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] " Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-20 21:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] hash: add predictable RSS API Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-19 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] hash: add predictable RSS implementation Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-19 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] test/hash: add additional thash tests Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-29 9:13 ` David Marchand
2021-04-29 9:17 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-04-29 18:45 ` Stanislaw Kardach
2021-05-04 14:06 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-04-19 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/5] doc: add thash documentation Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-20 11:25 ` Mcnamara, John
2021-04-19 15:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] maintainers: claim maintainership of the hash library Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-13 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] hash: add predictable RSS API Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-14 17:06 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-04-13 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] hash: add predictable RSS implementation Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-14 17:51 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-04-13 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] test/hash: add additional thash tests Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-14 17:56 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-04-11 19:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] hash: add predictable RSS API Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-11 19:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] hash: add predictable RSS implementation Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-11 19:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] test/hash: add additional thash tests Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-06 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] hash: add predictable RSS API Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-10 0:05 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-04-11 18:52 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-04-06 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] hash: add predictable RSS implementation Vladimir Medvedkin
2021-04-07 12:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2021-04-11 18:51 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-04-12 9:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-13 12:28 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-04-10 0:10 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2021-04-11 18:52 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2021-04-06 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] test/hash: add additional thash tests Vladimir Medvedkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB4491B58CD26988E83EC504C69A759@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=andrey.chilikin@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).