DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
To: Ivan Malov <Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"Xueming(Steven) Li" <xuemingl@nvidia.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to shared action conf
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:37:47 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR12MB49874EC8F040C13972DBAABAD6100@DM6PR12MB4987.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB498785B9D8DD51CA9FA4F37BD6130@DM6PR12MB4987.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Ivan,
PSB small comment about the comment,

And feel free to add my ack.

Best,
Ori

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ori Kam
> Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2020 11:35 AM
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to
> shared action conf
> 
> Hi Ivan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ori Kam
> > Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2020 10:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to
> > shared action conf
> >
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ivan Malov <Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru>
> > > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 10:35 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to
> > > shared action conf
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 30/10/2020 18:49, Xueming(Steven) Li wrote:
> > > > Hi Ivan,
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Ivan Malov
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 7:47 PM
> > > >> To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > >> Cc: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> > > >> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Andrew
> > > >> Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> > > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to
> > > >> shared action conf
> > > >>
> > > >> In a flow rule, attribute "transfer" means operation level at which both
> > > traffic
> > > >> is matched and actions are conducted.
> > > >>
> > > >> Add the very same attribute to shared action configuration.
> > > >> If a driver needs to prepare HW resources in two different ways,
> > depending
> > > >> on the operation level, in order to set up an action, then this new
> attribute
> > > >> will indicate the level.
> > > >> Also, when handling a flow rule insertion, the driver will be able to turn
> > > >> down a shared action if its level is unfit.
> > > > Most actions apply to both level, rss and queue action applies on non-
> > transfer
> > > level,
> > > > Port action applies to transfer level. Is there a particular scenario for this
> > new
> > > attribute?
> > >
> > > Most doesn't mean all, and you've already described some of the
> > > exceptions. And that's exactly the deal. Particular scenarios are don't
> > > cares given the fact that such an attribute is meant to be a generic
> > > solution. If an action happens to be supported on both levels, this
> > > doesn't necessarily mean that HW resources/objects that need to be
> > > prepared in the two cases are of the same type (or programmed to the NIC
> > > the same way). This is exactly what applies to flow rules (which do have
> > > attribute transfer) and what should be done to shared action conf, too.
> > >
> > > If this still seems vague, please let me know.
> > >
> >
> > The only question is can we see a reason to share action between transfer
> and
> > non transfer?
> >
> > I don't see such a reason and I think it can improve the code. So I vote to add
> it.
> >
> >
> > In any case, you are missing the rte_flow rst update.
> > I can see that the rst also misses the ingress bits, can you please also
> > create a fix for those?
> >
> Please disregard my last comment about doc update.
> 
> Ori
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Ori
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
> > > >> ---
> > > >>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 7 +++++++
> > > >>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > index
> > > >> a8eac4deb..0b993d8eb 100644
> > > >> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > >> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > > >> @@ -3487,6 +3487,13 @@ struct rte_flow_shared_action_conf {
> > > >>   	/**< Action valid for rules applied to ingress traffic. */
> > > >>   	uint32_t egress:1;
> > > >>   	/**< Action valid for rules applied to egress traffic. */
> > > >> +
> > > >> +	/**
> > > >> +	 * This attribute matches that of the flow rules which
> > > >> +	 * are supposed to comprise the given shared action.
> > > >> +	 * See struct rte_flow_attr.
> > > >> +	 */
Can you please rephrase the comment, to something like 
"Action valid for transfer traffic."

> > > >> +	uint32_t transfer:1;
> > > >>   };
> > > >>
> > > >>   /**
> > > >> --
> > > >> 2.20.1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ivan M

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-02  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-29 11:46 Ivan Malov
2020-10-29 11:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: support shared flow action attribute transfer Ivan Malov
2020-10-29 12:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to shared action conf Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-29 12:54   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-30 15:49 ` Xueming(Steven) Li
2020-10-30 20:35   ` Ivan Malov
2020-11-01  8:11     ` Ori Kam
2020-11-01  9:35       ` Ori Kam
2020-11-02  9:37         ` Ori Kam [this message]
2020-11-02 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Ivan Malov
2020-11-02 11:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: support shared flow action attribute transfer Ivan Malov
2020-11-02 11:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to shared action conf Ivan Malov
2020-11-02 11:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] app/testpmd: support shared flow action attribute transfer Ivan Malov
2020-11-02 14:04     ` Ori Kam
2020-11-02 13:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: introduce transfer attribute to shared action conf Andrew Rybchenko
2020-11-02 21:44     ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-11-02 18:54   ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-03 14:10     ` Ivan Malov
2020-11-03 15:52       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-11-03 14:20     ` Andrey Vesnovaty
2020-11-03 16:05       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM6PR12MB49874EC8F040C13972DBAABAD6100@DM6PR12MB4987.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xuemingl@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git