From: Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong@arm.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"rsanford@akamai.com" <rsanford@akamai.com>,
"erik.g.carrillo@intel.com" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>,
"olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"yipeng1.wang@intel.com" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
"sameh.gobriel@intel.com" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
"anatoly.burakov@intel.com" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"declan.doherty@intel.com" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"ciara.power@intel.com" <ciara.power@intel.com>,
"xiaoyun.li@intel.com" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
"nicolas.chautru@intel.com" <nicolas.chautru@intel.com>,
"maryam.tahhan@intel.com" <maryam.tahhan@intel.com>,
"reshma.pattan@intel.com" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
"cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 10/12] app/testpmd: use compiler atomic builtins for port sync
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:51:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DU2PR08MB728735BCD55FC1A79554245B92949@DU2PR08MB7287.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBAPR08MB58145C2243EAC108689D424998929@DBAPR08MB5814.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
> + Ferruh
>
> <snip>
>
> Hi Joyce/Ferruh,
> I do not think the port_status changes need to be handled atomically. The
> changes to port_status do not seem to be happening from multiple threads.
> It seems to be getting modified during initialization or through the test pmd
> prompt.
>
> Do we really need atomic operations on port_status?
>
Hi Honnappa,
Seem you are right, I shall remove the atomic operations for port_status.
Joyce
> >
> > Replace rte_atomic16_cmpset operation with compiler atomic CAS
> > operation for port status sync in testpmd case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 75
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 10:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/12] use compiler atomic builtins for app Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 01/12] test/pmd_perf: use compiler atomic builtins for polling sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-08 22:50 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-10 6:10 ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 02/12] test/ring_perf: use compiler atomic builtins for lcores sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 5:43 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 03/12] test/timer: use compiler atomic builtins for sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 20:59 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 04/12] test/stack_perf: use compiler atomics for lcore sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 21:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 05/12] test/bpf: use compiler atomics for calculation Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 06/12] test/func_reentrancy: use compiler atomic for data sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 21:54 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 07/12] app/eventdev: use compiler atomic builtins for packets sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-10 23:19 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-11 7:27 ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 08/12] app/crypto: use compiler atomic builtins for display sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 22:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 09/12] app/compress: " Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 22:59 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-11 8:13 ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 10/12] app/testpmd: use compiler atomic builtins for port sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 23:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-11 8:51 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 11/12] app/bbdev: use compiler atomics for thread sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-10 21:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 12/12] app: remove unnecessary include of atomic Joyce Kong
2021-10-21 6:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/12] use compiler atomic builtins for app Joyce Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DU2PR08MB728735BCD55FC1A79554245B92949@DU2PR08MB7287.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=maryam.tahhan@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=rsanford@akamai.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).