From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4A1333 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:12:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2014 05:06:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,581,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="537106820" Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2014 05:12:20 -0700 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.62]) by IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.106]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 13:11:21 +0100 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Olivier MATZ , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix vdev test in test_eal_flags Thread-Index: AQHPlQ4CNHuEqpi50kOIaMVN3HUcw5uLGQpw///0UQCAABNxIA== Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 12:11:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <53B27D70.4090102@6wind.com> <1404206489-30703-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <53B2A2F8.4060901@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: <53B2A2F8.4060901@6wind.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix vdev test in test_eal_flags X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:12:18 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 1:01 PM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix vdev test in test_eal_fl= ags >=20 > Hi Pablo, >=20 > On 07/01/2014 01:44 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: > > Thanks for this. It works fine :) >=20 > Thanks for testing! >=20 > > Actually, I am thinking of creating a separate test > > for vdev, out of whitelist test, as it has no relation with it. Do you = agree on > this? >=20 > I have no problem with that, it makes sense. Just to confirm: it means > that Thomas should not apply our previous patches from this thread and > wait for your next one, right? That's it :) >=20 > Regards, > Olivier Thanks, Pablo