Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor

["De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>]

> 
> From: BYEONG-GI KIM [mailto:kimbyeonggi@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:09 AM
> To: Masaru Oki; De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor
> 
> It works fine with DPDK at least.
> 
> The problem is that OVDK, especially ovs-dpdk command supported by the
> OVDK, doesn't work correctly. I tested the DPDK application, l3fwd, in order
> to know where the incorrect operation comes from, either DPDK or OVDK
> itself. And I know now the issue seems belonging to OVDK. :) In the OVDK,
> the physical ports even could not detected...

I assume you are using DPDK 1.7. DPDK-ovs team has been working on a fix for that,
so you should check on their mailing list.

> 
> Best regards
> 
> Byeong-Gi KIM
> 
> 2014-08-21 19:00 GMT+09:00 Masaru Oki <m-oki@stratosphere.co.jp>:
> I have SUPERMICRO A1SRi-2758F mainboard (onboard Atom C2758),
> and onboard NICs work fine with DPDK application.
> 
> 2014-08-21 18:17 GMT+09:00 BYEONG-GI KIM <kimbyeonggi@gmail.com>:
> 
> Well, I did think that the NIC in my testing machine may not support DPDK
> rather than thinking l3fwd is not working.
> 
> I just tested the l3fwd sample application to identify whether the NIC
> supports DPDK or not.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Byeong-Gi KIM
> 
> 
> 2014-08-21 18:14 GMT+09:00 Chae-yong Chong <cychong@gmail.com>:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > Could you give the details why you think the l3fwd is not working
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Chae-yong
> >
> > 2014년 8월 21일 목요일, BYEONG-GI
> KIM<kimbyeonggi@gmail.com>님이 작성한 메시지:
> >
> > Thank you for the reply.
> >>
> >> I tested l3forwarding sample application, and the results were as below:
> >>
> >> sudo ./build/l3fwd -c 0x0F -n 4 -- -p 0x03
> >> --config="(0,0,0),(0,1,1),(1,0,2),(1,1,3)"
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 1 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 2 as core 2 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 3 as core 3 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 4 as core 4 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 5 as core 5 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 6 as core 6 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Detected lcore 7 as core 7 on socket 0
> >> EAL: Support maximum 64 logical core(s) by configuration.
> >> EAL: Detected 8 lcore(s)
> >> EAL: Searching for IVSHMEM devices...
> >> EAL: No IVSHMEM configuration found!
> >> EAL: Setting up memory...
> >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x5ffc00000 bytes
> >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x2aa4aae00000 (size = 0x5ffc00000)
> >>
> >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes
> >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7ffff3e00000 (size = 0x200000)
> >> EAL: Ask a virtual area of 0x200000 bytes
> >> EAL: Virtual area found at 0x7ffff3a00000 (size = 0x200000)
> >> EAL: Requesting 12288 pages of size 2MB from socket 0
> >> EAL: TSC frequency is ~2399998 KHz
> >> EAL: Master core 0 is ready (tid=f7fe9800)
> >> EAL: Core 3 is ready (tid=f5998700)
> >> EAL: Core 2 is ready (tid=f6199700)
> >> EAL: Core 1 is ready (tid=f699a700)
> >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:14.0 on NUMA socket -1
> >> EAL:   probe driver: 8086:1f41 rte_igb_pmd
> >> EAL:   PCI memory mapped at 0x7ffff7f8d000
> >> EAL:   PCI memory mapped at 0x7ffff7f89000
> >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:14.1 on NUMA socket -1
> >> EAL:   probe driver: 8086:1f41 rte_igb_pmd
> >> EAL:   PCI memory mapped at 0x7ffff7f69000
> >> EAL:   PCI memory mapped at 0x7ffff7f65000
> >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:14.2 on NUMA socket -1
> >> EAL:   probe driver: 8086:1f41 rte_igb_pmd
> >> EAL:   0000:00:14.2 not managed by UIO driver, skipping
> >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:14.3 on NUMA socket -1
> >> EAL:   probe driver: 8086:1f41 rte_igb_pmd
> >> EAL:   0000:00:14.3 not managed by UIO driver, skipping
> >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:14.2 on NUMA socket -1
> >> EAL:   probe driver: 8086:1f41 rte_igb_pmd
> >> EAL:   0000:00:14.2 not managed by UIO driver, skipping
> >> EAL: PCI device 0000:00:14.3 on NUMA socket -1
> >> EAL:   probe driver: 8086:1f41 rte_igb_pmd
> >> EAL:   0000:00:14.3 not managed by UIO driver, skipping
> >> Initializing port 0 ... Creating queues: nb_rxq=2 nb_txq=4...
> >>  Address:0C:C4:7A:05:52:7A, Allocated mbuf pool on socket 0
> >> LPM: Adding route 0x01010100 / 24 (0)
> >> LPM: Adding route 0x02010100 / 24 (1)
> >> LPM: Adding route IPV6 / 48 (0)
> >> LPM: Adding route IPV6 / 48 (1)
> >> txq=0,0,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
> TX
> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >> txq=1,1,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
> TX
> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >> txq=2,2,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
> TX
> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >> txq=3,3,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
> TX
> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >>
> >> Initializing port 1 ... Creating queues: nb_rxq=2 nb_txq=4...
> >>  Address:0C:C4:7A:05:52:7B, txq=0,0,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver
> >> performance, consider setting the TX WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >> txq=1,1,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
> TX
> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >> txq=2,2,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
> TX
> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >> txq=3,3,0 PMD: To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
> TX
> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
> >>
> >>
> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 0 ... rxq=0,0,0
> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 1 ... rxq=0,1,0
> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 2 ... rxq=1,0,0
> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 3 ... rxq=1,1,0
> >>
> >> Checking link status.................done
> >> Port 0 Link Up - speed 100 Mbps - full-duplex
> >> Port 1 Link Up - speed 100 Mbps - full-duplex
> >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 1
> >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 3
> >> L3FWD:  -- lcoreid=1 portid=0 rxqueueid=1
> >> L3FWD:  -- lcoreid=3 portid=1 rxqueueid=1
> >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 0
> >> L3FWD:  -- lcoreid=0 portid=0 rxqueueid=0
> >> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 2
> >> L3FWD:  -- lcoreid=2 portid=1 rxqueueid=0
> >>
> >> Anyway, I'll also try to test the testpmd application.
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Byeong-Gi KIM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-08-21 17:56 GMT+09:00 De Lara Guarch, Pablo <
> >> pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>:
> >>
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI
> KIM
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:04 AM
> >> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> >> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor
> >> > >
> >> > > Hello.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2758 on the DPDK testing
> machines,
> >> > but
> >> > > it seems not working.
> >> > >
> >> > > Which sample application would be recommended to test the NIC
> actually
> >> > > works well with DPDK?
> >> > >
> >> > > Best regards
> >> > >
> >> > > Byeong-Gi KIM
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Testpmd is the best application you can use for that.
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Pablo
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > May the Fun with you.
> >
>