From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05EE58E8 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:00:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2015 02:56:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,565,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="651159872" Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.23]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2015 03:00:42 -0800 Received: from irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.3) by IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:00:36 +0000 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.64]) by irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:00:36 +0000 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Ilan Borenshtein , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] CPU utilization without the time spent for polling the Ethernet Thread-Index: AdBGryiVuLYAKIvUTXaTWLZnpSgPcAAA/DlQ Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:00:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] CPU utilization without the time spent for polling the Ethernet X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:00:45 -0000 Hi Ilan, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Borenshtein > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 10:34 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] CPU utilization without the time spent for polling th= e > Ethernet >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I would like to measure the CPU utilization without the time spent for po= lling > the Ethernet. > Doe's DPDK supports this in any way ? Not for the moment, but Pawel Wodkowski is working on that now.=20 He sent a patchset for that (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/2722/ and= http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/2723/), which is under review now, but it may be useful for you. Pablo >=20 > Thanks, > Ilan B