From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB4D2A5B for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:26:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2015 00:26:39 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,372,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="832495414" Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.99]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2015 00:26:39 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.23]) by IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:26:37 +0000 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Yu Nemo Wenbin , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: add rte_hash_set_cmp_func() function to DPDK_2.2. Thread-Index: AQHRLKfut2giTVnMikq0QhsZ4d9BVZ63XE9Q Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:26:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1449022747-1056-1-git-send-email-yuwb_bjy@ctbri.com.cn> In-Reply-To: <1449022747-1056-1-git-send-email-yuwb_bjy@ctbri.com.cn> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: add rte_hash_set_cmp_func() function to DPDK_2.2. X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:26:40 -0000 Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yu Nemo Wenbin > Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 2:19 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: add rte_hash_set_cmp_func() function > to DPDK_2.2. >=20 > Give user a chance to customize the hash key compare function. > The default rte_hash_cmp_eq function is set in the rte_hash_create > function, but these builtin ones may not be good enough, so the user > may call this to override the default one. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Yu Nemo Wenbin Why did you send this patch again? I see that the only thing you changed wa= s the title, and you don't need to include "to DPDK_2.2" in there. The only comment I ha= d is that you should have included versioning of the patch ("PATCH v2 or v3"). Thanks, Pablo