DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:19:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CC2BEB1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALe+Z010y06i0K8Twg6h4uGibX_O-MKUzRR4QbmT+xqpZAffdA@mail.gmail.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: jblunck@gmail.com [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan
> Blunck
> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 3:53 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require
> rte_vdev.h
> 
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:32 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch,
> >> Pablo
> >> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 12:05 PM
> >> To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to
> >> not require rte_vdev.h
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Jan Blunck [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan Blunck
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 8:59 PM
> >> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> >> > Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch,
> >> > Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> >> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require
> >> > rte_vdev.h
> >> >
> >> > The rte_cryptodev_vdev_pmd_init() is a helper for vdev-based drivers.
> >> > By moving the helper to the header we don't require rte_vdev.h at
> >> > build- time of the librte_cryptodev library. This is a preparation
> >> > to move the vdev bus into a standalone library.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
> >>
> >> I am seeing some clang errors when applying this patch:
> >>
> >> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h:88:14: error: implicit
> >> declaration of function 'rte_cryptodev_pmd_allocate' is invalid in
> >> C99 [- Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >>         cryptodev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_allocate(name, socket_id);
> >>                     ^
> >> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h:88:12: error: incompatible
> >> integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct rte_cryptodev *' from
> 'int'
> >> [-Werror,-Wint-conversion]
> >>         cryptodev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_allocate(name, socket_id);
> >>
> 
> Pablo,
> 
> I can not reproduce this. There is already an include for
> rte_cryptodev_pmd_allocate() in rte_cryptodev_vdev.h.

Yes, but you are adding that header file in patch 4, so patch 3 fails.
You should add it in patch 3:

--- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #include <rte_vdev.h>
 #include <inttypes.h>

+#include "rte_cryptodev_pmd.h"
 #include "rte_cryptodev.h"

 #define RTE_CRYPTODEV_VDEV_DEFAULT_MAX_NB_QUEUE_PAIRS  8

> 
> >> Also, looks like git commit title is not correct, according to check-git-
> log.sh:
> >>
> >> Wrong headline format:
> >>         cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h
> >
> 
> This script complains about underscores ...

Yes, could you reword it a bit? Instead of rte_vdev, use vdev header?

> 
> Tell me what you think,
> Jan

Thanks,
Pablo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-05 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-12  7:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-07-12  7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:35   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12  7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] cryptodev: rework cryptodev PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:39   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 13:07     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-15 11:04     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-09-04 14:32       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-05 14:52         ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-05 15:19           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo [this message]
2017-07-12 19:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-07-19 13:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-27 19:31     ` Jan Blunck
2017-08-01 10:39       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06  8:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 Jan Blunck
2017-10-25 14:33     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-25 16:05       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06  8:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-10-06  8:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-10-10  8:45     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06  8:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10  8:47     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-10 11:29       ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 12:49         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-11 14:45           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06  8:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10  8:48     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CC2BEB1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jblunck@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).