From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: 'Jan Blunck' <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: "'dev@dpdk.org'" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:45:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CC30536@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CC2F16F@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 1:50 PM
> To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jblunck@gmail.com [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan
> > Blunck
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 12:30 PM
> > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev
> > header
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:47 AM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> > <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jan Blunck [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan Blunck
> > >> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 9:40 AM
> > >> To: dev@dpdk.org
> > >> Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch,
> > >> Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> > >> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev
> header
> > >>
> > >> The rte_cryptodev_vdev_pmd_init() is a helper for vdev-based drivers.
> > >> By moving the helper to the header we don't require rte_vdev.h at
> > >> build- time of the librte_cryptodev library. This is a preparation
> > >> to move the vdev bus into a standalone library.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
> > >
> > > This looks good, but could you also remove the deprecation notice
> > > from
> > the previous release?
> > > Apart from that:
> > >
> >
> > I wondered about that too. The message said that it will be static
> > from
> > 17.11 on and I wonder if we should actually keep it into the notes for
> > this release.
>
> Well, actually this change should be added in release notes (under API
> changes, I think), and removed from deprecation.rst.
Are you going to send a new patchset soon, so it can make RC1?
Thanks!
Pablo
>
> Thanks,
> Pablo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 7:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:35 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] cryptodev: rework cryptodev PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:39 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 13:07 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-15 11:04 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-09-04 14:32 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-05 14:52 ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-05 15:19 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-07-19 13:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-27 19:31 ` Jan Blunck
2017-08-01 10:39 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 Jan Blunck
2017-10-25 14:33 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-25 16:05 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:45 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:47 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-10 11:29 ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 12:49 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-11 14:45 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo [this message]
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:48 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CC30536@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jblunck@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).