From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:33:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CC3CC26@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171006083934.34819-1-jblunck@infradead.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Blunck [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan Blunck
> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 9:40 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1
>
> This series is a preparation to move the vdev bus out of librte_eal. For that
> the newly added cryptodev vdev functions need to change signature to not
> require the rte_vdev.h header.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - move params parsing into new header
> - make rte_cryptodev_vdev_pmd_init() static inline
>
> Changes since v2:
> - fix bisect compile errors
> - workaround check-git-log.sh stupidity
>
> Jan Blunck (4):
> cryptodev: remove obsolete include
> cryptodev: move initialization
> cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header
> cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header
>
> lib/librte_cryptodev/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 3 +
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 1 -
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.c | 37 +---------
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h | 71 ++++++++-----------
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h | 89
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_version.map | 1 -
> 7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) create mode 100644
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h
>
> --
> 2.13.2
Hi Jan,
Declan has submitted a patchset that drops all vdev/PCI code from cryptodev,
so it superseds your two last patches.
Therefore, I will drop them and get the first two. The end goal should be the same,
Anyway.
Thanks,
Pablo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-25 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-12 7:59 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:35 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 7:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] cryptodev: rework cryptodev PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 12:39 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 13:07 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] cryptodev: rework PMD init to not require rte_vdev.h Jan Blunck
2017-07-15 11:04 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-09-04 14:32 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-05 14:52 ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-05 15:19 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-12 19:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-07-19 13:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for -rc2 De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-07-27 19:31 ` Jan Blunck
2017-08-01 10:39 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 Jan Blunck
2017-10-25 14:33 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo [this message]
2017-10-25 16:05 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] cryptodev: remove obsolete include Jan Blunck
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: move initialization Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:45 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:47 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-10 11:29 ` Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 12:49 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-11 14:45 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-10-06 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header Jan Blunck
2017-10-10 8:48 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8976CC3CC26@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jblunck@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).