From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBA71BA08 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:05:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2017 09:05:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,432,1503385200"; d="scan'208";a="142138186" Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.23]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2017 09:05:55 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.167]) by IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.28]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:05:53 +0100 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Jan Blunck , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Doherty, Declan" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 Thread-Index: AQHTPn6+fbUW7UZGSUSpRsPw9BUUYKL0voTQgAAYFvA= Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:05:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20170712195846.65286-1-jblunck@infradead.org> <20171006083934.34819-1-jblunck@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMjQ2ZWQxODktMTEzOS00YjE2LWExYmEtYjk4MWVlNmQ0MGUwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6InJzdzQ2THRTVU5sTnFIR0NPaXprWklsbTNkcitoUmw0cklHQWJYZGliYVk9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:05:58 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch, > Pablo > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 3:33 PM > To: Jan Blunck ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Doherty, Declan > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11- > rc1 >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Blunck [mailto:jblunck@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan Blunck > > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 9:40 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Doherty, Declan ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > > > > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 > > > > This series is a preparation to move the vdev bus out of librte_eal. > > For that the newly added cryptodev vdev functions need to change > > signature to not require the rte_vdev.h header. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - move params parsing into new header > > - make rte_cryptodev_vdev_pmd_init() static inline > > > > Changes since v2: > > - fix bisect compile errors > > - workaround check-git-log.sh stupidity > > > > Jan Blunck (4): > > cryptodev: remove obsolete include > > cryptodev: move initialization > > cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header > > cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header > > > > lib/librte_cryptodev/Makefile | 1 + > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 3 + > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 1 - > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.c | 37 +--------- > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h | 71 ++++++++--------= --- > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h | 89 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_version.map | 1 - > > 7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) create mode > > 100644 lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h > > > > -- > > 2.13.2 >=20 > Hi Jan, >=20 > Declan has submitted a patchset that drops all vdev/PCI code from > cryptodev, so it superseds your two last patches. >=20 > Therefore, I will drop them and get the first two. The end goal should be= the > same, Anyway. >=20 > Thanks, > Pablo Patch 1 and 2 applied to dpdk-next-crypto. Thanks, Pablo