From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4172F4F for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 15:39:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2018 06:39:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,374,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="38028881" Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.23]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2018 06:39:40 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.150]) by IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.176]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 7 May 2018 14:39:39 +0100 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Akhil Goyal , Hemant Agrawal , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: Nipun Gupta Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue pairs to 2 Thread-Index: AQHT2MDUhFUFgXUWmUiwi0NRitkBm6QkYBeQ Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 13:39:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1524156759-12931-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <1524156759-12931-4-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYTE3NjMwMTEtN2U1ZC00NTdjLThkMGItNWEwMGMzZDQxOTViIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkhReXJ1dThGcVpCNXBWam15K3ZDdjhaTFhLY0dqXC9CZ1FtdmRWclhIODZBPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.200.100 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue pairs to 2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 13:39:47 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch, Pabl= o > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 5:00 PM > To: Akhil Goyal ; Hemant Agrawal > ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Nipun Gupta > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue > pairs to 2 >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 11:40 AM > > To: Hemant Agrawal ; dev@dpdk.org; De Lara > > Guarch, Pablo > > Cc: Nipun Gupta > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue pairs > > to 2 > > > > Hi Hemant, > > On 4/20/2018 3:53 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Hi Hemant/Nipun > > >> On 4/19/2018 10:22 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > >>> From: Nipun Gupta > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta > > >>> --- > > >>> drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h | 2 +- > > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> b/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> index 1433595..5b25aa1 100644 > > >>> --- a/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > > >>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct dpaa_sec_qp { > > >>> int tx_errs; > > >>> }; > > >>> > > >>> -#define RTE_DPAA_MAX_NB_SEC_QPS 1 > > >>> +#define RTE_DPAA_MAX_NB_SEC_QPS 2 > > >>> #define RTE_DPAA_MAX_RX_QUEUE > > >> RTE_DPAA_SEC_PMD_MAX_NB_SESSIONS > > >>> #define DPAA_MAX_DEQUEUE_NUM_FRAMES 63 > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Why 2? I think it should be 8. > > >> > > > [Hemant] Ok. Sending v2 > > > > I guess this need some testing whether it will break the existing use c= ases or > not. > > > > Pablo, > > > > I recommend, it would be good if you can apply the other 3 patches in > > this series in RC1. This patch should be hold back for RC2. >=20 > Good to me. Any update on this? > Thanks, > Pablo >=20 > > > > Thanks, > > Akhil