From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CACF1B059 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:48:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jul 2018 15:48:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,330,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="53788865" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2018 15:48:12 -0700 Received: from irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.3) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:48:11 +0100 Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.193]) by irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.181]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 23:48:11 +0100 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Anoob Joseph , "Richardson, Bruce" CC: Jerin Jacob , Narayana Prasad , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v1 06/15] examples/l2fwd: fix lines exceeding 80 char limit Thread-Index: AQHUA8kltrWfeWUMrUKkW8161IN4G6SHpcSQ Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 22:48:10 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1528477766-15788-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> <1528971477-14156-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> <1528971477-14156-7-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <1528971477-14156-7-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiOWRhYTFiNmEtNmZmOS00YjQ0LWJmMjAtNmQ1MmI0YTgwOTQ2IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoidUVTVmp1aFVhaVR4Z1YxanU1elBzOXRQQktKQzZNZjBkVDRZQzZXNmZqb2tJK2dmd09sUmdISEhjTXh5UCsydiJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.200.100 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 06/15] examples/l2fwd: fix lines exceeding 80 char limit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 22:48:57 -0000 Hi Anoob, > -----Original Message----- > From: Anoob Joseph [mailto:anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 11:18 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > > Cc: Anoob Joseph ; Jerin Jacob > ; Narayana Prasad > ; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH v1 06/15] examples/l2fwd: fix lines exceeding 80 char lim= it >=20 > v1: > * Replaced 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' >=20 > Fixes: e2366e74e029 ("examples: use buffered Tx") > Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph I don't think it is needed to have this patch. Generally, new code should = follow the 80 char limit, But I think we don't need to have a patch fixing existing code (and definit= ely, this doesn't need backport).