From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CD98E99 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:31:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2015 01:31:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,706,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="797787524" Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.23]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2015 01:31:09 -0700 Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.98]) by IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.139]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:30:09 +0100 From: "Van Haaren, Harry" To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: remove rx jabber from ierrors Thread-Index: AQHRBqOOWRYUWHC5BUmlaMHdSFywhp5ziyCAgACINwA= Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:30:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20151014163553.GB7420@bricha3-MOBL3> <1444842744-14658-1-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909020A09AA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC0909020A09AA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: remove rx jabber from ierrors X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:31:16 -0000 Hi Wenzhuo, > From: Lu, Wenzhuo > > Remove receive jabber count from ierrors count as the registers overlap= , > > previously causing some packets to be counted twice. > > Would you like to let us know which register RJC overlaps into? Thanks. It seems that the RJC register overlaps with CRC errors. Thanks for looking at this patch, -Harry