From: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:10:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA651008AAE@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3800883.jMHuFJQnlm@xps>
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 10:56 AM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources
>
> 29/01/2018 11:45, Harry van Haaren:
> > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
> > +Finalizing and Cleanup
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +
> > +During the initialization of EAL resources such as hugepage backed memory
> can be
> > +allocated by core components. The memory allocated during
> ``rte_eal_init()``
> > +can be released by calling the ``rte_eal_finalize()`` function. Refer to
> the
> > +API documentation for details.
>
> About naming, what is better between
> rte_eal_finalize() and
> rte_eal_cleanup() ?
> I tend to think that "cleanup" is more descriptive.
Sure cleanup() is fine for me, I'll spin a v3 with the function name change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-29 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-27 18:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] service: move finalize to internal Harry van Haaren
2018-01-27 18:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources Harry van Haaren
2018-01-27 18:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] app/pdump: call eal finalize before exit Harry van Haaren
2018-01-27 18:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] app/proc_info: " Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 10:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] service: move finalize to internal Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 10:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 10:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-29 11:10 ` Van Haaren, Harry [this message]
2018-01-29 11:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-29 12:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-01-29 12:12 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2018-01-29 10:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] app/pdump: call eal finalize before exit Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 10:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] app/proc_info: " Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] service: move finalize to internal Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 15:07 ` Varghese, Vipin
2018-01-29 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] app/pdump: call eal cleanup before exit Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 15:09 ` Varghese, Vipin
2018-01-29 12:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] app/proc_info: " Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 15:09 ` Varghese, Vipin
2018-01-29 15:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] service: move finalize to internal Varghese, Vipin
2018-01-29 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] app/pdump: call eal cleanup before exit Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 16:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] app/proc_info: " Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 16:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] service: move finalize to internal Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 16:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] eal: add function to release internal resources Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 18:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-29 16:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] app/pdump: call eal cleanup before exit Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 16:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] app/proc_info: " Harry van Haaren
2018-01-29 18:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] service: move finalize to internal Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E923DB57A917B54B9182A2E928D00FA651008AAE@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).