From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C929E7 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:06:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Feb 2017 15:06:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,348,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="41727331" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2017 15:06:52 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx112.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.6) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:06:52 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.230]) by FMSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.137]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:06:52 -0800 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: Stephen Hemminger CC: "Chen, Jing D" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Rogers, Gerald" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/2] prgdev: introduce generic prgdev API Thread-Index: AQHScwdzPpCX6XAOnUSQ2iancgjx56FgW1aAgAAEx4A= Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:06:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1484882498-18653-1-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> <1484882498-18653-3-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com> <20170208144945.0ce116ee@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20170208144945.0ce116ee@xeon-e3> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.254.19.238] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5CCFBFB4CA95834DB52B382646B7C4B3@intel.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/2] prgdev: introduce generic prgdev API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 23:06:54 -0000 > On Feb 8, 2017, at 4:49 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:21:38 +0800 > "Chen Jing D(Mark)" wrote: >=20 >> +struct rte_prg_dev_info { >> + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< Device PCI information. */ >=20 > NAK >=20 > No new API should refer to PCI devices. We are trying to make all referen= ces > to devices generic. Crypto suceeded, ether is in process, but no new ones= please. The design is not PCI centric and should not be PCI centric, it is just wha= t they started with months ago. So please look past the PCI bits as they ha= ve not integrated into the latest code base yet. Regards, Keith