DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andriy Berestovskyy <berestovskyy@gmail.com>
To: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
	"jerin.jacob@cavium.com" <jerin.jacob@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] ether: use a default for max Rx frame size in configure()
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:20:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EDBB9816-FD39-4657-BEEC-046C28A2FF70@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR05MB4426109FDE704ACB66A28D45C36B0@DB7PR05MB4426.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Shahaf,

> On 23 May 2018, at 07:21, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com> wrote:
> I think this patch addressing just small issue in a bigger problem.
> The way I see it all application needs to specify is the max packet size it expects to receive, nothing else(!). 

[...]

> IMO The "jumbo_frame" bit can be set by the underlying PMD directly to the device registers given the max_rx_pkt_len configuration. 

Sure, it can be deducted in PMD if max_rx_pkt_len is greater than the normal frame size.

The background behind this patch was to fix some examples on some platforms by allowing them to just set the jumbo bit in config and let the DPDK to deduct the optimal jumbo max_rx_pkt_len.

There was also another patch which fixed those examples, so they first query the max_rx_pkt_len and then pass it with the config:
http://dpdk.org/commit/5e470a6654

That patch has been merged, so now we can fix/change the API in any way we decide, there is no urgency anymore.

Looks like the jumbo bit in config is redundant, but there might be other opinions.

Andriy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-24  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 17:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ether: fix configure() to use a default for max_rx_pkt_len Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-03-24 11:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ether: use a default for max Rx frame size in configure() Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-03-27  6:15   ` Yang, Qiming
2017-03-27  8:38     ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-07  8:24       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-04-06 20:48   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-07  8:09     ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-07  8:34       ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-07  8:55         ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-07 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-07 12:15   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-07 12:29     ` Bruce Richardson
2017-04-07 14:18       ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-07 14:47         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-07 15:27           ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-20 22:25             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-24 14:50               ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-07-31 22:33                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-22 22:30                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-23  5:21                     ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-05-23  5:23                       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-05-24  9:20                       ` Andriy Berestovskyy [this message]
2019-01-23 18:36                         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-01-25 21:15                           ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-10 14:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: limit max frame size Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-10 14:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] examples/ip_reassembly: " Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-10 14:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/ipv4_multicast: " Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-04-21  0:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: " Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-08 16:51 ` [PATCH v3] ether: use a default for max Rx frame size in configure() Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EDBB9816-FD39-4657-BEEC-046C28A2FF70@gmail.com \
    --to=berestovskyy@gmail.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@cavium.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).