From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp137.ord.emailsrvr.com (smtp137.ord.emailsrvr.com [173.203.6.137]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6415916 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:49:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp30.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp30.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 90810238A23 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:50:35 -0400 (EDT) X-SMTPDoctor-Processed: csmtpprox beta Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp30.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8BDDA238D7D for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:50:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from smtp192.mex05.mlsrvr.com (unknown [184.106.31.85]) by smtp30.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 5592D238D6E for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:50:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ORD2MBX05H.mex05.mlsrvr.com ([fe80::c08:20ff:fe52:4153]) by ORD2HUB35.mex05.mlsrvr.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0169.001; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:50:26 -0500 From: "David P. Reed" To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: IEEE 1588 support? Thread-Index: AQHPQtKL0nMeHnVp102wpAFCtDZyTQ== Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:50:26 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [209.6.168.90] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <53DBAD32A2F8494588611DD837EAD45C@mex05.mlsrvr.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] IEEE 1588 support? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:49:04 -0000 Hi - I got the notice that DPDK is now supported for FreeBSD. That=92s gr= eat - it could be useful. One question that I have is - does DPDK provide access to, and performance/= precision for, the support of IEEE 1588 at the hardware level for 10 GigE N= ICs/switches that enable that? It=92s not obvious from the documentation scan I did. David P. Reed, Ph.D. TidalScale, Inc.