DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix compile errors on Oracle Linux6.4 and RHEL6.5
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:59:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A736EB8@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3962139.NISuUL0v1x@xps13>

Hi Thomas

Were you talking about the "#ifndef ether_addr_equal "?
The compile errors I copied in that patch shows that the function has already been defined in include/linux/etherdevice.h on Oracle Linux6.4. In this case, it seems not always true as you said.
The method came from the standard Linux driver, so I think it should be useful and has been reviewed by Linux kernel community.

Oops, it seems that there are useless code which I need to remove. I will update it later! Thank you very much for the pointing!

Regards,
Helin

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 6:03 PM
To: Zhang, Helin
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix compile errors on Oracle Linux6.4 and RHEL6.5

Hi Helin,

2014-06-09 16:38, Helin Zhang:
>  #if ( LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3,5,0) )  #define 
> skb_tx_timestamp(skb) do {} while (0) -#if !(RHEL_RELEASE_CODE && 
> RHEL_RELEASE_CODE >= RHEL_RELEASE_VERSION(6,4)) -static inline bool 
> ether_addr_equal(const u8 *addr1, const u8 *addr2)
> +#ifndef ether_addr_equal

It should be always true as it is a function (not known by the preprocessor).

> +static inline bool __kc_ether_addr_equal(const u8 *addr1, const u8 
> +*addr2)
>  {
>  	return !compare_ether_addr(addr1, addr2);  } -#endif
> +#define ether_addr_equal(_addr1, _addr2) 
> +__kc_ether_addr_equal((_addr1),(_addr2))
> +#endif /* __kc_ether_addr_equal*/

So it is always replacing ether_addr_equal() by a kcompat equivalent for old kernels, even if ether_addr_equal() is already defined as a C function.
Just to confirm: is it really what we want?

[...]
> -#endif
> +#define ethtool_adv_to_mmd_eee_adv_t(adv) \
> +__kc_ethtool_adv_to_mmd_eee_adv_t(adv)

An indentation is missing here.

> +#endif /* ethtool_adv_to_mmd_eee_adv_t */ #endif /* */

Why an empty comment?

Thanks
--
Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09  8:38 Helin Zhang
2014-06-10 10:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-06-10 14:59   ` Zhang, Helin [this message]
2014-06-10 15:27     ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-06-10 11:23 ` Neil Horman
2014-06-11  5:46   ` Zhang, Helin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A736EB8@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).