From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847FDB366 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:11:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2014 01:07:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,862,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="370743125" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2014 01:11:10 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.6) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 01:14:21 -0700 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by FMSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 01:14:21 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.17]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.174]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:14:19 +0800 From: "Zhang, Helin" To: "Wodkowski, PawelX" Thread-Topic: SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration Thread-Index: Ac+1OFzBKtAM5KBZTo6WNfSE2w/DtQAA4ldg Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:14:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:11:34 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wodkowski, PawelX > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 4:05 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] SRIOV mode and different RX and TX configuration >=20 > Hi, > I am wondering if there is a sense in having different configuration in f= or RX and > TX mode in SR-IOV mode. Ex RX mode ETH_MQ_RX_NONE and TX mode > ETH_MQ_TX_VMDQ_DCB or something similar. > I am asking because in code there is no difference between number of RX > queues and TX queues reported to VF and if having different configuration= in RX > and TX is possible this must be taken into account. > Pawe=B3 W=F3dkowski > Sii Engineer > Delivering outsourced services to Intel Hi Pawel Though I am not sure if understood your question, I am trying to give some = comments. Do you mean the configurable number of rx/tx queues in VF? For Niantic, har= dware just supports only one queue in VF, so there is no flexibility for th= at. For later NICs like i40e, we will have that flexibility. Regards, Helin