From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE9A7FB1 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:19:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2014 01:27:58 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,808,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="622628619" Received: from pgsmsx103.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.82]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2014 01:27:57 -0700 Received: from pgsmsx106.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.98) by PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:26:23 +0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.110.14) by pgsmsx106.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:26:24 +0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.174]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.207]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:26:22 +0800 From: "Zhang, Helin" To: GongJinrong , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] How to improve the TX performance? Thread-Index: Ac/zUKmGRwFsxHpCT/6D9Y/O9Fw+PgAATnwQ Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:26:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How to improve the TX performance? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:19:26 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of GongJinrong > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:22 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] How to improve the TX performance? >=20 > Hi, Guys >=20 > I am using DPDK for the packet transmission, but rte_eth_tx_burst() se= ems > drops too many packets, the NIC is 82574, anyone to help, thanks a lot. > also, does DPDK has a reliable TX API for no packet drop? You may need to provide more details of your platform, use case, and config= urations. >=20 > Best Regard > John Gong Regards, Helin