From: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Rowden, Aaron F" <aaron.f.rowden@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e: workaround for X710 performance issues
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 02:49:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A7DC410@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8B6DD36@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing
> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 10:44 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Chen, Jing D; Liu, Jijiang; Cao, Waterman; Lu, Patrick; Rowden, Aaron F
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] i40e: workaround for X710 performance issues
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Helin
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 4:23 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Chen, Jing D; Wu, Jingjing; Liu, Jijiang; Cao, Waterman; Lu,
> > Patrick; Rowden, Aaron F; Zhang, Helin
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] i40e: workaround for X710 performance issues
> >
> > On X710, performance number is far from the expectation on recent
> > firmware versions. The fix for this issue may not be integrated in the
> > following firmware version. So the workaround in software driver is needed.
> > It needs to modify the initial values of 3 internal only registers.
> > Note that the workaround can be removed when it is fixed in firmware in the
> future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 89
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
> >
> > v2 changes:
> > * Added a compile error fix.
> >
> > v3 changes:
> > * Used PRIx32 and PRIx64 instead for printing uint32_t and uint64_t
> > variables.
> > * Re-worded annotations, and commit logs.
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > index 008d62c..624f0ce 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static int i40e_dev_filter_ctrl(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> > enum rte_filter_type filter_type,
> > enum rte_filter_op filter_op,
> > void *arg);
> > +static void i40e_configure_registers(struct i40e_hw *hw);
> >
> > /* Default hash key buffer for RSS */ static uint32_t
> > rss_key_default[I40E_PFQF_HKEY_MAX_INDEX + 1]; @@ -
> > 443,6 +444,16 @@ eth_i40e_dev_init(__rte_unused struct eth_driver
> > *eth_drv,
> > /* Clear PXE mode */
> > i40e_clear_pxe_mode(hw);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * On X710, performance number is far from the expectation on
> > recent
> > + * firmware versions. The fix for this issue may not be integrated in
> > + * the following firmware version. So the workaround in software
> > driver
> > + * is needed. It needs to modify the initial values of 3 internal only
> > + * registers. Note that the workaround can be removed when it is
> > fixed
> > + * in firmware in the future.
> > + */
> > + i40e_configure_registers(hw);
> > +
> > /* Get hw capabilities */
> > ret = i40e_get_cap(hw);
> > if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
> > @@ -5294,3 +5305,81 @@ i40e_pctype_to_flowtype(enum
> i40e_filter_pctype
> > pctype)
> >
> > return flowtype_table[pctype];
> > }
> > +
> > +static int
> > +i40e_debug_read_register(struct i40e_hw *hw, uint32_t addr, uint64_t
> > +*val) {
> > + struct i40e_aq_desc desc;
> > + struct i40e_aqc_debug_reg_read_write *cmd =
> > + (struct i40e_aqc_debug_reg_read_write
> > *)&desc.params.raw;
> > + enum i40e_status_code status;
> > +
> > + i40e_fill_default_direct_cmd_desc(&desc,
> > i40e_aqc_opc_debug_read_reg);
> > + cmd->address = rte_cpu_to_le_32(addr);
> > + status = i40e_asq_send_command(hw, &desc, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > + if (status < 0)
> > + return status;
> > +
> > + *val = ((uint64_t)(rte_le_to_cpu_32(cmd->value_high)) <<
> > (CHAR_BIT *
> > + sizeof(uint32_t))) + rte_le_to_cpu_32(cmd-
> > >value_low);
> > +
>
> Do we need to add rte_le_to_cpu_64 here?
No, we don't need one more conversion, as 32 bits value are already 'cpu' byte order.
Thanks,
Helin
>
> > + return status;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * On X710, performance number is far from the expectation on recent
> > +firmware
> > + * versions. The fix for this issue may not be integrated in the
> > +following
> > + * firmware version. So the workaround in software driver is needed.
> > +It needs
> > + * to modify the initial values of 3 internal only registers. Note
> > +that the
> > + * workaround can be removed when it is fixed in firmware in the future.
> > + */
> > +static void
> > +i40e_configure_registers(struct i40e_hw *hw) {
> > +#define I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0 0x26CE00
> > +#define I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2 0x26CE08
> > +#define I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR 0x269FBC
> > +#define I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0_VALUE 0x10000200 #define
> > +I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2_VALUE 0x011f0200
> > +#define I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR_VALUE 0x03030303
> > +
> > + static const struct {
> > + uint32_t addr;
> > + uint64_t val;
> > + } reg_table[] = {
> > + {I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0,
> > I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0_VALUE},
> > + {I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2,
> > I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2_VALUE},
> > + {I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR,
> > I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR_VALUE},
> > + };
> > + uint64_t reg;
> > + uint32_t i;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Below fix is for X710 only */
> > + if (i40e_is_40G_device(hw->device_id))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(reg_table); i++) {
> > + ret = i40e_debug_read_register(hw, reg_table[i].addr, ®);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to read from
> > 0x%"PRIx32,
> > + reg_table[i].addr);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Read from 0x%"PRIx32":
> > 0x%"PRIx64,
> > + reg_table[i].addr, reg);
> > + if (reg == reg_table[i].val)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + ret = i40e_aq_debug_write_register(hw, reg_table[i].addr,
> > + reg_table[i].val, NULL);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to write 0x%"PRIx64" to
> > the "
> > + "address of 0x%"PRIx32, reg_table[i].val,
> > + reg_table[i].addr);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Write 0x%"PRIx64" to the address
> > of "
> > + "0x%"PRIx32, reg_table[i].val, reg_table[i].addr);
> > + }
> > +}
> > --
> > 1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-08 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-15 7:09 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Helin Zhang
2014-12-15 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Helin Zhang
2014-12-16 2:29 ` Chen, Jing D
2014-12-16 2:43 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-16 8:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Helin Zhang
2014-12-16 8:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-16 11:07 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-16 9:07 ` Chen, Jing D
2014-12-17 0:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-08 2:43 ` Wu, Jingjing
2015-01-08 2:49 ` Zhang, Helin [this message]
2015-01-09 5:29 ` Wu, Jingjing
2015-01-09 15:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-12 0:26 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-01-12 0:39 ` Wu, Jingjing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A7DC410@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.f.rowden@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).