From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9920111C5 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 05:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2015 20:54:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,502,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="700729760" Received: from pgsmsx105.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.96]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2015 20:54:26 -0700 Received: from shsmsx151.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.50) by PGSMSX105.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:54:25 +0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.94]) by SHSMSX151.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.180]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:54:24 +0800 From: "Zhang, Helin" To: 'Nissim Nisimov' Thread-Topic: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment Thread-Index: AQHQiNQ/xilfK9NqzkGx1SGsGrsiU511okEQgABoB4CAAB19f4AB57dQgBc/6iA= Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 03:54:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD906423BDF6F@ILMB1.corp.radware.com> <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD90642428A41@ILMB1.corp.radware.com> <94AA676E9B9A384A844E7692F3CAD90642432170@ILMB1.corp.radware.com>, 5899d592-8c87-47d9-92b6-d34260ce1aa4@radware.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "'dev@dpdk.org'" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with multi-segment X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 03:54:29 -0000 Hi Nissim Sorry for late reply! Today I got a ready environment, and tried the latest DPDK code (on master = branch) on my environment, it works well. So could you help to try the latest code (R2.0 +) on your environment again= , to see if the issue is still there or not? Regards, Helin > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhang, Helin > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:51 PM > To: Nissim Nisimov > Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org' > Subject: RE: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment >=20 > Hi Nissim >=20 > It seems that our validation guys here can reproduce it in our lab. I wil= l > check that soon later, and update you later. > Thank you very much for the good finding! >=20 > Regards, > Helin >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nissim Nisimov [mailto:NissimN@Radware.com] > > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 11:44 AM > > To: Zhang, Helin > > Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org' > > Subject: RE: Intel fortville not working with multi-segment > > > > Hi, > > > > I am using PF pass-through and it doesn't work even with 2000 bytes of > > server response page size. > > Looks like the first segment of each session is not received. > > > > When i am changing the server response size to 1000 bytes, all works > > as expected. > > > > I am working with dpdk 1.8 version. > > > > Any idea why ? Is it related to i40e multi segment support? > > > > Thx > > Nissim > > > > On May 11, 2015 5:03 AM, "Zhang, Helin" > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Nissim > > > > > > Are you using PF pass-through or VF pass-through? > > > For PF pass-through, you might have already gotten the fix. > > > For VF pass-through, there is > > > > Hi Nissim > > > > Are you using PF pass-through or VF pass-through? > > For PF pass-through, you might have already gotten the fix. > > For VF pass-through, there is a bug fix which is needed for supporting > > jumbo frame and multiple mbuf. > > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4641/ > > > > > > Regards, > > Helin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nissim > Nisimov > > > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:48 AM > > > To: Nissim Nisimov; 'dev@dpdk.org' > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with > > > multi-segment > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > can someone assist regarding this issue? > > > > > > Is it a known limitation in i40e/dpdk (no support for multi-segment)? > > > > > > Thx > > > Nissim > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Nissim > Nisimov > > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:44 PM > > > To: 'dev@dpdk.org' > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Intel fortville not working with multi-segment > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to work with Intel Fortville (XL710) NICs in Passthrough > > > mode from a VM running dpdk app. > > > > > > > > > First I didn't have any TX traffic from the VM, I got dpdk patch for > > > this issue and it fixed it. > > > (http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4588/) > > > > > > But now I see that when trying to run multi-segment traffic not all > > > the packets reaching the VM (I tested it on bare metal as well and > > > saw the same issue) > > > > > > Is it a known issue? any workaround for it? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nissim