From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <helin.zhang@intel.com> Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC40C6F0 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:29:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 08:29:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,585,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="775283774" Received: from pgsmsx105.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.96]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 08:29:14 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by PGSMSX105.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 23:29:13 +0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.45]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.126]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 23:29:12 +0800 From: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com> Thread-Topic: config files maintenance Thread-Index: AQHQy6L2U6UVPprO9E6ycQAnRsT1/J31sekA Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:29:11 +0000 Message-ID: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A8B8424@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <2490473.jjJga3lrlm@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2490473.jjJga3lrlm@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] config files maintenance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:29:21 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 8:08 AM > To: Zhang, Helin; Ananyev, Konstantin; Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: config files maintenance >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Currently most of the build options are duplicated in 2 config files. > They should be merged in a common file to avoid this kind of differences: >=20 > --- config/common_bsdapp > +++ config/common_linuxapp > -CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR=3Dn > +CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR=3Dy > -CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_RX_OLFLAGS_DISABLE=3Dn > +CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_RX_OLFLAGS_ENABLE=3Dy > -CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC=3Dn > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC=3Dy >=20 > Can we enable ixgbe SSE on BSD? > CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_RX_OLFLAGS_DISABLE must be renamed to > CONFIG_RTE_IXGBE_RX_OLFLAGS_ENABLE, or can we remove this option? > Can we remove i40e bulk alloc option? As the receiving functions are different for bulk_alloc or not, we need thi= s flag. > Why IEEE1588 is disabled? Can we remove this option? I think the reason was it wanted to show the best performance by default, as more processing are needed for ieee1588 in fast path. I agree with you that we may need to re-think it. Thanks, Helin >=20 > Please help to fix it for the release 2.1. >=20 > After fixing the config, we have to think about simplifying it in 2.2. > It would be easier to have some kind of config overlays: > config_base > config_bsd > config_linux > config_osv > config_gcc > config_icc > config_clang > config_i686 > config_x86_64 > config_x86_x32 > config_ppc_64 > config_tile-tilegx > Then the defconfig files would include the above files. > Or better, we could allow some paramaters to make config: > make config ARCH=3D OS=3D CC=3D >=20 > Thoughts?