From: Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/hash: use existing lcore API
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 14:15:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F4D62D31-14A6-45B9-B7A1-9D25F64296FA@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8xEqfMMsPWPbS6zshmBjvsmeWCftMA=8JCLn0fS1BzQ9w@mail.gmail.com>
> On May 27, 2019, at 5:15 AM, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Dharmik,
Hi David,
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 9:38 PM Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com> wrote:
> > On May 22, 2019, at 12:17 PM, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 6:27 PM Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -738,10 +736,9 @@ struct {
> > > rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader,
> > > (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type,
> > > enabled_core_ids[i]);
> > > - rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
> > >
> > > for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++)
> > > - if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0)
> > > + if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(i) < 0)
> > if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(enabled_core_ids[i]) < 0)
> >
> > (There are similar changes in other functions too.
> > I realize that this is a separate issue than what the patch is aimed for.
> > If you see fit, please integrate it, else I will put out a patch once your patch has been merged.)
> >
> > Indeed, reproduced.
> >
>
> Did you have a chance to look at this ?
> These loops could be reworked by using RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE() (so that it automatically skips the master lcore) removing the need for enabled_core_ids[].
>
Yes, I have tried to use RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE() and eliminate enabled_core_ids[]. However, the code becomes quite complicated to read with if statements
within RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(), to break the loop (since not all slave cores are checked for). This is a snip from test_hash_multi_add_lookup():
/* snip */
RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(core_id) {
if (i < rwc_core_cnt[n])
rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader,
(void *)(uintptr_t)read_type,
core_id);
else if (i >= rwc_core_cnt[n] &&
i < (rwc_core_cnt[n] +
rwc_core_cnt[m])) {
rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_multi_writer,
(void *)(uintptr_t)pos_core,
core_id);
pos_core++;
} else
break;
i++;
}
>
> --
> David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-28 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 7:56 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " David Marchand
2019-05-15 7:56 ` David Marchand
2019-05-15 7:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: " David Marchand
2019-05-15 7:57 ` David Marchand
2019-05-15 12:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-15 12:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-15 20:04 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-15 20:04 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-05-15 12:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/hash: " Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-15 12:14 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-22 0:16 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-05-22 12:40 ` David Marchand
2019-05-22 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " David Marchand
2019-05-22 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/rcu: " David Marchand
2019-05-23 14:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-05-29 22:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-22 16:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/hash: " Dharmik Thakkar
2019-05-22 17:17 ` David Marchand
2019-05-22 19:37 ` Dharmik Thakkar
2019-05-27 10:15 ` David Marchand
2019-05-28 14:15 ` Dharmik Thakkar [this message]
2019-05-23 12:48 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F4D62D31-14A6-45B9-B7A1-9D25F64296FA@arm.com \
--to=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).