DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ouyang, Changchun" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support setting TX rate for queue and VF
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 03:11:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F9625117C8871@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140526225257.GB15911@neilslaptop.think-freely.org>

Hi, Neil

" but you're implementaiton requires that it be re-implemented for each PMD "

[Changchun]: Different PMD(corresponding diff NIC) has different register to set.
It makes sense to me has different implementation to support limit tx rate.
 
" Why not just export max tx rates from the PMD and write a generic queuing libarary to do rate limitation for any PMD?"

[Changchun]: Just export max tx rate is not enough for customer.
I think if we can leverage HW feature to do it, why need a more complicated lib to do so? 

Thanks
Changchun

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman@tuxdriver.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 6:53 AM
To: Ouyang, Changchun
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support setting TX rate for queue and VF

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:45:28PM +0800, Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> This patch v2 fixes some errors and warnings reported by checkpatch.pl.
>  
> This patch series also contain the 3 items:
> 1. Add API to support setting TX rate for a queue or a VF.
> 2. Implement the functionality of setting TX rate for queue or VF in IXGBE PMD.
> 3. Add commands in testpmd to test the functionality of setting TX rate for queue or VF.
> 
> Ouyang Changchun (3):
>   Add API to support set TX rate for a queue and VF.
>   Implement the functionality of setting TX rate for queue or VF in
>     IXGBE PMD.
>   Add commands in testpmd to test the functionality of setting TX rate
>     for queue or VF.
> 
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c              | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  app/test-pmd/config.c               |  47 +++++++++++
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.h              |   3 +
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c       |  71 ++++++++++++++++
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h       |  51 ++++++++++++
>  lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++  
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h |  13 ++-
>  7 files changed, 462 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
This seems a bit backwards.  queue rate limiting is rather a generic function, that doesn't really need to know any details about the hardware, save for its maximum tx rate, but you're implementaiton requires that it be re-implemented for each PMD.  Why not just export max tx rates from the PMD and write a generic queuing libarary to do rate limitation for any PMD?

Neil

> --
> 1.9.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-05  3:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-26  7:45 Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-26  7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] ether: Add API to support " Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-27 22:47   ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-06-05  3:30     ` Ouyang, Changchun
2014-06-10 23:02       ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-26  7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] ixgbe: Implement the functionality of setting TX rate for queue or VF in IXGBE PMD Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-26  7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] testpmd: Add commands to test the functionality of setting TX rate for queue or VF Ouyang Changchun
2014-05-26 22:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Support setting TX rate for queue and VF Neil Horman
2014-06-05  3:11   ` Ouyang, Changchun [this message]
2014-06-05 11:01     ` Neil Horman
     [not found] ` <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F9625117C89F0@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2014-06-05  5:32   ` Liu, Jijiang
2014-06-05 12:41 ` Cao, Waterman
2014-06-06  6:52 ` Xie, Huawei
2014-06-11 14:05   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F9625117C8871@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=changchun.ouyang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).