From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96AE7F74
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  6 Nov 2014 01:37:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2014 16:47:07 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,322,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="627343572"
Received: from pgsmsx103.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.82])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2014 16:47:06 -0800
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by
 PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.195.1; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:44:43 +0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.156]) by
 SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.202]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001;
 Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:44:42 +0800
From: "Ouyang, Changchun" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "Xie, Huawei"
 <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost: Check offset value
Thread-Index: AQHP+Meh4v4d2sUe7kmyV6rQOGe9spxRug4AgAACSYCAAQdCMA==
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 00:44:42 +0000
Message-ID: <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F96251188160F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1415084708-8192-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
 <1415171435-24252-4-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B0F2E2149@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <2415734.hoAF1yVSAI@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <2415734.hoAF1yVSAI@xps13>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost: Check offset value
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:37:44 -0000

Agree with Thomas! using small patches is for easily understanding.=20
Merging and mixing things together is not a good thing.

Changchun

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 1:01 AM
> To: Xie, Huawei
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ouyang, Changchun
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost: Check offset value
>=20
> 2014-11-05 16:52, Xie, Huawei:
> > Why don't we merge 1,2,3 patches?
>=20
> Because it's simpler to understand small patches with a dedicated
> explanation in the commit log of each patch.
> Why do you want to merge them?
>=20
> --
> Thomas