From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB46A2A9 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 06:41:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2014 21:41:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,542,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="650710738" Received: from kmsmsx152.gar.corp.intel.com ([172.21.73.87]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2014 21:41:42 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by KMSMSX152.gar.corp.intel.com (172.21.73.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:41:41 +0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.216]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.182]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 13:41:40 +0800 From: "Ouyang, Changchun" To: "Qiu, Michael" , Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation Thread-Index: AQHQEq9IYZVt6icOSU2o3C0ovIVpDpyGvqHg Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 05:41:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1418019716-4962-1-git-send-email-changchun.ouyang@intel.com> <4047137.blhnCyLAqS@xps13> <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E60286C9DE44@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <533710CFB86FA344BFBF2D6802E60286C9DE44@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 05:41:45 -0000 Hi > -----Original Message----- > From: Qiu, Michael > Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:23 AM > To: Ouyang, Changchun; Thomas Monjalon; Stephen Hemminger > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation >=20 > On 12/9/2014 9:11 AM, Ouyang, Changchun wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > >> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 5:31 PM > >> To: Ouyang, Changchun > >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio > >> implementation > >> > >> Hi Changchun, > >> > >> 2014-12-08 14:21, Ouyang Changchun: > >>> This patch set bases on two original RFC patch sets from Stephen > >> Hemminger[stephen@networkplumber.org] > >>> Refer to [http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-August/004845.html ] > >>> for > >> the original one. > >>> This patch set also resolves some conflict with latest codes and > >>> removed > >> duplicated codes. > >> > >> As you sent the patches, you appear as the author. > >> But I guess Stephen should be the author for some of them. > >> Please check who has contributed the most in each patch to decide. > > You are right, most of patches originate from Stephen's patchset, > > except for the last one, To be honest, I am ok whoever is the author > > of this patch set, :-), We could co-own the feature of Single virtio > > if you all agree with it, and I think we couldn't finish Such a > > feature without collaboration among us, this is why I tried to communic= ate > with most of you to collect more feedback, suggestion and comments for th= is > feature. > > Very appreciate for all kinds of feedback, suggestion here, especially = for > patch set from Stephen. > > > > According to your request, how could we make this patch set looks more > like Stephen as the author? > > Currently I add Stephen as Signed-off-by list in each patch(I got the > agreement from Stephen before doing this :-)). >=20 > Hi Ouyang, >=20 > "Signed-off-by" should be added by himself, because the one who in the > Signed-off-by list should take responsibility for it(like potential bugs/= issues). >=20 > Although, lots of patches are originate from Stephen, we still need himse= lf > add this line :) Hi Thomas,=20 It that right? I can't add Stephen into Signed-off-by list even if I have g= otten the agreement from Stephen, What 's the strict rule here? Thanks Changchun