From: "Ouyang, Changchun" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:11:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F962511C0803B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150717092756.16d7265e@urahara>
Hi Stephen,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 12:28 AM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] virtio: fix the vq size issue
>
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:48:50 +0800
> Ouyang Changchun <changchun.ouyang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > This commit breaks virtio basic packets rx functionality:
> > d78deadae4dca240e85054bf2d604a801676becc
> >
> > The QEMU use 256 as default vring size, also use this default value to
> > calculate the virtio avail ring base address and used ring base
> > address, and vhost in the backend use the ring base address to do packet
> IO.
> >
> > Virtio spec also says the queue size in PCI configuration is
> > read-only, so virtio front end can't change it. just need use the
> > read-only value to allocate space for vring and calculate the avail
> > and used ring base address. Otherwise, the avail and used ring base
> address will be different between host and guest, accordingly, packet IO
> can't work normally.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 14 +++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > index fe5f9a1..d84de13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > @@ -263,8 +263,6 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> > */
> > vq_size = VIRTIO_READ_REG_2(hw, VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_NUM);
> > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "vq_size: %d nb_desc:%d", vq_size,
> nb_desc);
> > - if (nb_desc == 0)
> > - nb_desc = vq_size;
>
> command queue is setup with nb_desc = 0
nb_desc is not used in the rest of the function, then why we need such an assignment here?
Why command queues is setup whit nb_desc = 0?
Even if it is the case, what the code change break?
>
> > if (vq_size == 0) {
> > PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "%s: virtqueue does not exist",
> __func__);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -275,15 +273,9 @@ int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - if (nb_desc < vq_size) {
> > - if (!rte_is_power_of_2(nb_desc)) {
> > - PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> > - "nb_desc(%u) size is not powerof 2",
> > - nb_desc);
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > - vq_size = nb_desc;
> > - }
> > + if (nb_desc != vq_size)
> > + PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Warning: nb_desc(%d) is not equal to
> vq size (%d), fall to vq size",
> > + nb_desc, vq_size);
>
> Nack. This breaks onn Google Compute Engine the vring size is 16K.
As I mentioned before, the commit d78deadae4dca240e85054bf2d604a801676becc break the basic functionality of virtio pmd,
I don't think keeping it broken is good way for us.
We have to revert it firstly to recover its functionality on qemu!
Why we need break current functionality to just meet a new thing's requirement?
>
> An application that wants to work on both QEMU and GCE will want to pass a
> reasonable size and have the negotiation resolve to best value.
Do you have already a patch to revert the mistaken and support both qemu and gce?
If you have, then pls send out it, and let's review.
>
> For example, vRouter passes 512 as Rx ring size.
> On QEMU this gets rounded down to 256 and on GCE only 512 elements are
> used.
>
> This is what the Linux kernel virtio does.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-18 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 7:48 Ouyang Changchun
2015-07-01 8:55 ` Xu, Qian Q
2015-07-01 15:53 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-07-02 0:29 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-07-02 2:01 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-07-02 2:16 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-07-02 9:15 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-07-03 1:53 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-07-10 14:05 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-07-10 14:11 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13 1:40 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-07-07 2:32 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-07-17 10:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-17 16:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-07-18 12:11 ` Ouyang, Changchun [this message]
2015-07-20 15:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-07-20 3:40 ` Xu, Qian Q
2015-07-20 6:18 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-07-20 10:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-21 5:23 ` Ouyang, Changchun
2015-07-20 15:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F52918179C57134FAEC9EA62FA2F962511C0803B@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=changchun.ouyang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).