From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D15ADF6 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:50:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.77] (99-34-229-174.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.34.229.174]) by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D072180C000; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:50:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Matthew Hall In-Reply-To: <20150222160204.20816910@urahara> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:50:53 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <3ABAA9DB-3F71-44D4-9C46-22933F9F30F0@mhcomputing.net> <20150222160204.20816910@urahara> To: Stephen Hemminger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: "" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Appropriate DPDK data structures for TCP sockets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 04:50:57 -0000 On Feb 22, 2015, at 4:02 PM, Stephen Hemminger = wrote: > Use userspace RCU? or BSD RB_TREE Thanks Stephen, I think the RB_TREE stuff is single threaded mostly. But user-space RCU looks quite good indeed, I didn't know somebody = ported it out of the kernel. I'll check it out. Matthew.=