From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322617F25 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:55:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2014 07:04:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,862,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="413044018" Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2014 06:56:19 -0800 Received: from irsmsx154.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.96) by IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:04:53 +0000 Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.25]) by IRSMSX154.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.116]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:04:52 +0000 From: "Wodkowski, PawelX" To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "Jastrzebski, MichalX K" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] bond: mode 4 support Thread-Index: AQHP+nq9+DGdv6q7JU237/mBCIaVzJxVLaAAgAAP7uA= Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:04:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1415358270-12523-1-git-send-email-michalx.k.jastrzebski@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] bond: mode 4 support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:55:27 -0000 Archived-At: List-Archive: > Since Declan sent a v6 for link bonding changes, maybe it is a good idea > to send another version, as v5 will not be merged. >=20 > Pablo Hi Pablo I compared v6 patches vs patches produced by git rebase v5 patches=20 on top which I used to produce mode 4 v3 patches and I think they are compatible. There is one difference is in unit tests but, fortunately I do not touch unit tests yet so they are be applicable. I can't fully verify that as I am unable to apply patches in v6. If you think this is insufficient perhaps I should wait for Declan's patche= s be merged into master branch. $ git apply d_v6/0007*.patch -v Checking patch app/test-pmd/cmdline.c... Checking patch app/test/test.h... Checking patch app/test/test_link_bonding.c... Checking patch app/test/virtual_pmd.c... Checking patch app/test/virtual_pmd.h... Checking patch doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst... error: doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst: No such file or directo= ry Checking patch lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond.h... Checking patch lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c... Checking patch lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_args.c... Checking patch lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c... Checking patch lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_private.h... Pawel