From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <caianning@huawei.com>
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [58.251.152.64])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0C758C3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:31:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 172.24.1.60 (EHLO nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com)
 ([172.24.1.60])
 by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
 with ESMTP id DRK47664; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:31:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from NKGEML514-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::40a8:f0d:c0f3:2ca5]) by
 nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id
 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:31:46 +0800
From: Caianning <caianning@huawei.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
CC: Houzhipeng <houzhipeng@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: can we set ethType for RANGE_PKT?
Thread-Index: AdIUzT+1xRVMeI2hQxiSnekF0cyWrw==
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:31:46 +0000
Message-ID: <F994AE62EFA2864BAC5A2B81D86C27C13E2D687E@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.111.146.139]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
 refid=str=0001.0A090206.57E3CF3A.0097, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000,
 cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0,
 so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 46c5ef5f0eede3361b672ec74839506f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] can we set ethType for RANGE_PKT?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:32:00 -0000

Hi
         I am doing a test using RANGE_PKT. I note that the function pktgen=
_set_pkt_type_range() is given, but it is not called. And there is pktgen_s=
et_pkt_type() for SINGLE_PKT.

         I guess I a pktgen_set_pkt_type() should call for both SINGLE_PKT =
and RANGE_PKT. Am I right?

But again, Where should the function be called? And is there a plan for it?

         Thanks.