From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FC2343C; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:22:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Apr 2019 07:22:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,296,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="219485899" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2019 07:22:33 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:22:33 -0700 Received: from hasmsx114.ger.corp.intel.com (10.184.198.65) by FMSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:22:33 -0700 Received: from hasmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.16]) by HASMSX114.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:22:30 +0300 From: "Stojaczyk, Dariusz" To: 'Thomas Monjalon' CC: "'dev@dpdk.org'" , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "'stable@dpdk.org'" , "Richardson, Bruce" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early Thread-Index: AQHU5APjFsFLn9yHZE2TJ9K2xhb7EqYfp3+AgABCsiCAB3nwwA== Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:22:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190326184331.13850-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com> <2545420.xP4CxeWPSp@xps> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.102.11.60] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 14:22:35 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 9:34 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z ; Burakov, Anatoly > ; stable@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 7:12 PM > > To: Stojaczyk, Dariusz > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z ; Burakov, Anatoly > > ; stable@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early > > > > 26/03/2019 19:43, Darek Stojaczyk: > > > We currently initialize rte_alarms after starting > > > to listen for IPC hotplug requests, which gives > > > us a data race window. Upon receiving such hotplug > > > request we always try to set an alarm and this > > > obviously doesn't work if the alarms weren't > > > initialized yet. > > > > > > To fix it, we initialize alarms before starting > > > to listen for IPC hotplug messages. Specifically, > > > we move rte_eal_alarm_init() right after > > > rte_eal_intr_init() as it makes some sense to > > > keep those two close to each other. > > > > I wonder which regression it will bring :) > > The experience shows that we cannot touch this function > > without introducing a regression. Please check twice. >=20 > Hah, ok - I'll check again the possible outcomes of this. >=20 Done, I can't see any case I could break. > > > > > Fixes: 244d5130719c ("eal: enable hotplug on multi-process") > > > Cc: Qi Zhang > > > Cc: Anatoly Burakov > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk > > > --- > > > lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c | 12 ++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > You probably need to update the FreeBSD version too. > > >=20 > Oh, that I cannot do. First of all, in bsd code I don't see > rte_mp_dev_hotplug_init() called anywhere, as if bsd > did not listen for IPC hotplug messages at all and hence did > not have any data race in this area. Second, I would be > afraid to touch any bsd code as I'm not running any bsd > system. Basing on Anatoly's feedback, I pushed a v2 with bsd changes included as well. Thanks! D. >=20 > D. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DA3A0679 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:22:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5243B378E; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:22:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FC2343C; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:22:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Apr 2019 07:22:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,296,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="219485899" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2019 07:22:33 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:22:33 -0700 Received: from hasmsx114.ger.corp.intel.com (10.184.198.65) by FMSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:22:33 -0700 Received: from hasmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.16]) by HASMSX114.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:22:30 +0300 From: "Stojaczyk, Dariusz" To: 'Thomas Monjalon' CC: "'dev@dpdk.org'" , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "'stable@dpdk.org'" , "Richardson, Bruce" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early Thread-Index: AQHU5APjFsFLn9yHZE2TJ9K2xhb7EqYfp3+AgABCsiCAB3nwwA== Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:22:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190326184331.13850-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com> <2545420.xP4CxeWPSp@xps> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.102.11.60] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190401142230.TxueIDzPjru-m_7J9vwjwZUb90kZ6i_YgwSVxdPrFzU@z> > -----Original Message----- > From: Stojaczyk, Dariusz > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 9:34 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z ; Burakov, Anatoly > ; stable@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 7:12 PM > > To: Stojaczyk, Dariusz > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z ; Burakov, Anatoly > > ; stable@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: initialize alarms early > > > > 26/03/2019 19:43, Darek Stojaczyk: > > > We currently initialize rte_alarms after starting > > > to listen for IPC hotplug requests, which gives > > > us a data race window. Upon receiving such hotplug > > > request we always try to set an alarm and this > > > obviously doesn't work if the alarms weren't > > > initialized yet. > > > > > > To fix it, we initialize alarms before starting > > > to listen for IPC hotplug messages. Specifically, > > > we move rte_eal_alarm_init() right after > > > rte_eal_intr_init() as it makes some sense to > > > keep those two close to each other. > > > > I wonder which regression it will bring :) > > The experience shows that we cannot touch this function > > without introducing a regression. Please check twice. >=20 > Hah, ok - I'll check again the possible outcomes of this. >=20 Done, I can't see any case I could break. > > > > > Fixes: 244d5130719c ("eal: enable hotplug on multi-process") > > > Cc: Qi Zhang > > > Cc: Anatoly Burakov > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk > > > --- > > > lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal.c | 12 ++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > You probably need to update the FreeBSD version too. > > >=20 > Oh, that I cannot do. First of all, in bsd code I don't see > rte_mp_dev_hotplug_init() called anywhere, as if bsd > did not listen for IPC hotplug messages at all and hence did > not have any data race in this area. Second, I would be > afraid to touch any bsd code as I'm not running any bsd > system. Basing on Anatoly's feedback, I pushed a v2 with bsd changes included as well. Thanks! D. >=20 > D.