From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAAAAD95 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:17:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2015 06:15:52 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,631,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="655869634" Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.157]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2015 06:15:51 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.218]) by IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.247]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:15:49 +0000 From: "Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/11] qemu vhost-user support Thread-Index: AQHQRoHvfvzqHy1n7UuZ2DhzMY8ILZzy9X+AgAoWCgCAAUPDMIAACC2AgAABKNA= Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:15:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1423717649-11818-1-git-send-email-huawei.xie@intel.com> <1727453.AIDsD1IOKp@xps13> <6222029.8i8idLyxNx@xps13> In-Reply-To: <6222029.8i8idLyxNx@xps13> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/11] qemu vhost-user support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:17:03 -0000 > 2015-02-23 13:53, Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw: > > > I tried to locally applied the patches, waiting comments are closed. > > > But I stopped after patch 04/11 which makes compilation failing. > > > I'm so sorry that we still don't have a vhost-user support integrated= in DPDK. > > > I feel it won't be ready in next days to be able to enter in 2.0 vers= ion. > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > You are seeing this compile failure because Huawei was working on an > > older tree and did a rebase as patch #10. > > If you apply all the patches from the series they compile and work just= fine. > > > > Unfortunately Huawei is not available at the moment. > > We could squash all the patches into one and resend it to the ML. > > Is that ok? >=20 > Are you joking? I was expecting this answer, sorry for that. > No we need to have patches well split and have them compiling. > Is there someone able to fix correctly the patchset and resubmit them? > I don't want to lose time to fix it myself. I'll fix the patchset and resubmit. Przemek